Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Behavioral Economic Incentive Programs for Goal Achievement on Healthy Diet, Weight Control and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
dc.contributor.author | Boonmanunt S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pattanaprateep O. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ongphiphadhanakul B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mckay G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Attia J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Vlaev I. | |
dc.contributor.author | Thakkinstian A. | |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-19T07:30:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-05-19T07:30:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-04-12 | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Healthy diet, weight control and physical activity to reduce obesity can be motivated by financial incentives (FI). Behavioral-economic approaches may improve the incentivization effectiveness. This study compares and ranks the effectiveness of standard and behavioral incentivization for healthy diet, weight control, and physical activity promotion. PURPOSE: To investigate whether behavioral-economic insights improve incentivization effectiveness. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline and Scopus was performed from database inception to December 2020. Study characteristics, program designs, and risk ratio (RR) were extracted. A two-stage network meta-analysis pooled and ranked intervention effects. RESULTS: There were 35 eligible RCTs. For diet-weight control, standard FI, deposit contract (deposit), lottery-based incentive (lottery), and standard-FI + lottery increased goal achievement compared to no-FI but only deposit was statistically significant with pooled RRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of 1.21 (0.94, 1.56), 1.79 (1.04, 3.05), 1.45 (0.99, 2.13), and 1.73 (0.83, 3.63). For physical activity, standard-FI, deposit, and lottery significantly increased goal achievement compared to no-FI, with pooled RRs of 1.38 (1.13, 1.68), 1.63 (1.24, 2.14) and 1.43 (1.14, 1.80), respectively. In a follow-up period for physical activity, only deposit significantly increased goal achievement compared to no-FI, with pooled RRs of 1.39 (1.11, 1.73). CONCLUSION: Deposit, followed by lottery, were best for motivating healthy diet, weight control and physical activity at program end. Post-intervention, deposit then standard-FI were best for motivating physical activity. Behavioral insights can improve incentivization effectiveness, although lottery-based approaches may offer only short-term benefit regarding physical activity. However, the imprecise intervention effects were major concerns. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine Vol.57 No.4 (2023) , 277-287 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/abm/kaac066 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 15324796 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 36367428 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85148850317 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/81577 | |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | |
dc.subject | Psychology | |
dc.title | Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Behavioral Economic Incentive Programs for Goal Achievement on Healthy Diet, Weight Control and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis | |
dc.type | Article | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85148850317&origin=inward | |
oaire.citation.endPage | 287 | |
oaire.citation.issue | 4 | |
oaire.citation.startPage | 277 | |
oaire.citation.title | Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine | |
oaire.citation.volume | 57 | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | School of Medicine and Public Health | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Warwick Business School | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Hunter Medical Research Institute, Australia | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences |