Towards unified global action on ultra-processed foods: understanding commercial determinants, countering corporate power, and mobilising a public health response

dc.contributor.authorBaker P.
dc.contributor.authorSlater S.
dc.contributor.authorWhite M.
dc.contributor.authorWood B.
dc.contributor.authorContreras A.
dc.contributor.authorCorvalán C.
dc.contributor.authorGupta A.
dc.contributor.authorHofman K.
dc.contributor.authorKruger P.
dc.contributor.authorLaar A.
dc.contributor.authorLawrence M.
dc.contributor.authorMafuyeka M.
dc.contributor.authorMialon M.
dc.contributor.authorMonteiro C.A.
dc.contributor.authorNanema S.
dc.contributor.authorPhulkerd S.
dc.contributor.authorPopkin B.M.
dc.contributor.authorSerodio P.
dc.contributor.authorShats K.
dc.contributor.authorVan Tulleken C.
dc.contributor.authorNestle M.
dc.contributor.authorBarquera S.
dc.contributor.correspondenceBaker P.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-14T18:14:37Z
dc.date.available2025-12-14T18:14:37Z
dc.date.issued2025-12-06
dc.description.abstractThe rise of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) in human diets is harming global public health. However, policy responses are still emerging-much like tobacco control efforts decades ago-indicating the need to understand root causes and accelerate global action. This paper, the third in a three-part Lancet Series, takes several steps to advance knowledge of these causes, and to inform a global public health response. First, we show that the UPF industry is a key driver of the problem, as its leading corporations and co-dependent actors have expanded and restructured food systems almost everywhere, in favour of ultra-processed diets. The higher profitability of UPFs compared with other types of food fuels this growth, by financially incentivising the ultra-processed business model over alternatives, and generating resources for continued expansion. Second, we highlight that the main barrier to advancing policy responses is the industry's corporate political activities, coordinated transnationally through a global network of front groups, multi-stakeholder initiatives, and research partners, to counter opposition and block regulation. These activities include direct lobbying, infiltrating government agencies, and litigation; promoting corporate-friendly governance models, forms of regulation, and civil societies; and framing debate, generating favourable evidence, and manufacturing scientific doubt. Third, we present strategies for reducing the UPF industry's power in food systems and for mobilising a global public health response. Reducing the UPF industry's power involves disrupting the ultra-processed business model and redistributing resources to other types of food producers; protecting food governance from corporate interference; and implementing robust conflict of interest safeguards in policy making, research, and professional practice. Mobilising a global response includes framing UPFs as a priority global health issue; building powerful global and country-level advocacy coalitions; generating legal, research, and communication capacities to empower advocacy and drive policy change; and ensuring a just transition to low-UPF diets. A coordinated, well resourced global response is essential-one that confronts corporate power, reclaims public policy space, and restructures food systems to prioritise health, equity, and sustainability over corporate profit.
dc.identifier.citationLancet London England Vol.406 No.10520 (2025) , 2703-2726
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01567-3
dc.identifier.eissn1474547X
dc.identifier.pmid41270764
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105024128458
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/113507
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleTowards unified global action on ultra-processed foods: understanding commercial determinants, countering corporate power, and mobilising a public health response
dc.typeReview
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105024128458&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage2726
oaire.citation.issue10520
oaire.citation.startPage2703
oaire.citation.titleLancet London England
oaire.citation.volume406
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversidade de São Paulo
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity College London
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversité Paris Cité
oairecerif.author.affiliationNew York University
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
oairecerif.author.affiliationDeakin University
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversidad de Chile
oairecerif.author.affiliationUNC Gillings School of Global Public Health
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Ghana
oairecerif.author.affiliationThe University of Sydney School of Public Health
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstituto Nacional de Salud Publica
oairecerif.author.affiliationThe Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition
oairecerif.author.affiliationUnited Nations
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationNational Council for Humanities
oairecerif.author.affiliationNutrition Advocacy in Public Interest

Files

Collections