Assessing the Value for Money of Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Gaucher Disease Types 1 and 3b: Can Expanded Coverage Be Justified?
5
Issued Date
2025-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
25094262
eISSN
25094254
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105003812478
Journal Title
PharmacoEconomics - Open
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
PharmacoEconomics - Open (2025)
Suggested Citation
Rattanavipapong W., Anothaisintawee T., Isaranuwatchai W., Wattanasirichaigoon D., Tim-Aroon T., Wichajarn K., Sathienkijkanchai A., Charoenkwan P., Suphapeetiporn K., Traivaree C., Kuptanon C., Teerawattananon Y. Assessing the Value for Money of Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Gaucher Disease Types 1 and 3b: Can Expanded Coverage Be Justified?. PharmacoEconomics - Open (2025). doi:10.1007/s41669-025-00579-x Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/110018
Title
Assessing the Value for Money of Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Gaucher Disease Types 1 and 3b: Can Expanded Coverage Be Justified?
Author's Affiliation
Ramathibodi Hospital
Siriraj Hospital
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation
Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University
Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University
National University of Singapore
Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
Thailand Ministry of Public Health
Phramongkutklao College of Medicine
Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University
Siriraj Hospital
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation
Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University
Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University
National University of Singapore
Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
Thailand Ministry of Public Health
Phramongkutklao College of Medicine
Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program was commissioned to conduct a cost–utility and budget impact analysis of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for Gaucher disease types 1 and 3b. The findings from this assessment are to support the decision-making process regarding the potential expansion of ERT coverage within Thailand’s public health system. Methods: The analysis compared the current policy, which provides treatment with imiglucerase only for patients with Gaucher disease type 1, as listed in the National List of Essential Medicine, with a proposed policy that extends coverage to include Gaucher disease types 1 and 3b with either imiglucerase or velaglucerase. Cost–utility analysis of these policy options was performed using decision tree and Markov models over a lifetime horizon from a societal perspective. The financial implications for the relevant budgetary authority over 5 years were estimated. The research methodology adheres rigorously to Thailand’s health technology assessment guidelines. Results: The study found that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for treating both Gaucher disease types 1 and 3b are 6,769,000 and 9,359,000 baht per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for imiglucerase and velaglucerase, respectively, which is well beyond Thailand’s cost-effectiveness threshold of 160,000 baht per QALY. Such an expansion would incur an additional budgetary burden of approximately 81 million baht for imiglucerase and 138 million baht for velaglucerase. Increasing the rate of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can improve the cost-effectiveness of the expansion. Conclusions: The study concludes that expanding ERT with either imiglucerase or velaglucerase to treat both Gaucher disease types 1 and 3b is not cost-effective at current prices in Thailand; however, it could become cost-effective with a reduction of approximately 60% in drug prices or if all eligible patients undergo HSCT.