Evaluating the impact of visual training on athletic performance: a systematic review of key interventions (2012–2022)

dc.contributor.authorRamyarangsi P.
dc.contributor.authorNanbancha A.
dc.contributor.authorPokaisasawan A.
dc.contributor.authorKhobkhun F.
dc.contributor.authorAjjimaporn A.
dc.contributor.correspondenceRamyarangsi P.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-13T18:14:04Z
dc.date.available2025-10-13T18:14:04Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose. Visual skills are fundamental for athletic performance, yet studies present mixed evidence regarding the efficacy of visual training, with variations in methodologies and sport-specific applicability contributing to the ongoing debate. This systematic review evaluated various visual training interventions on athletes’ performance from 2012 to 2022. Methods. A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane (2012–2022) using terms such as ‘visual training’, ‘sports vision’, and ‘cognitive-motor training’ identified 24 eligible randomised controlled trials based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results. Fourteen distinct visual training programs were analysed, with Quiet Eye Training, Stroboscopic Training, and 3D-MOT Training being the most frequently investigated. Quiet Eye Training improved accuracy, gaze control, and stress regulation. Stroboscopic Training enhanced visuomotor coordination, although its effects on visual perception varied. 3D-MOT Training improved the ability to track multiple moving objects, particularly benefiting dynamic sports such as soccer. However, not all programs yielded significant performance gains, emphasising the importance of sport-specific training approaches. Conclusions. A key limitation was the variation in study designs and outcomes, which hindered direct comparisons. This review highlights the potential of visual training to improve athletic performance and underscores the need for future research with standardised protocols, larger sample sizes, and stronger emphasis on sport-specific applications and individual differences among athletes.
dc.identifier.citationHuman Movement Vol.26 No.3 (2025) , 19-32
dc.identifier.doi10.5114/hm/205322
dc.identifier.eissn18991955
dc.identifier.issn17323991
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105018031742
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/112561
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectHealth Professions
dc.titleEvaluating the impact of visual training on athletic performance: a systematic review of key interventions (2012–2022)
dc.typeReview
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105018031742&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage32
oaire.citation.issue3
oaire.citation.startPage19
oaire.citation.titleHuman Movement
oaire.citation.volume26
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationRangsit University

Files

Collections