Lazertinib Versus Gefitinib as First-Line Treatment in Patients With EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results From LASER301

dc.contributor.authorCho B.C.
dc.contributor.authorAhn M.J.
dc.contributor.authorKang J.H.
dc.contributor.authorSoo R.A.
dc.contributor.authorReungwetwattana T.
dc.contributor.authorYang J.C.H.
dc.contributor.authorCicin I.
dc.contributor.authorKim D.W.
dc.contributor.authorWu Y.L.
dc.contributor.authorLu S.
dc.contributor.authorLee K.H.
dc.contributor.authorPang Y.K.
dc.contributor.authorZimina A.
dc.contributor.authorFong C.H.
dc.contributor.authorPoddubskaya E.
dc.contributor.authorSezer A.
dc.contributor.authorHow S.H.
dc.contributor.authorDanchaivijitr P.
dc.contributor.authorKim Y.
dc.contributor.authorLim Y.
dc.contributor.authorAn T.
dc.contributor.authorLee H.
dc.contributor.authorByun H.M.
dc.contributor.authorZaric B.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-15T18:01:01Z
dc.date.available2023-09-15T18:01:01Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-10
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Lazertinib is a potent, CNS-penetrant, third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor. This global, phase III study (LASER301) compared lazertinib versus gefitinib in treatment-naïve patients with EGFR-mutated (exon 19 deletion [ex19del]/L858R) locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were 18 years and older with no previous systemic anticancer therapy. Neurologically stable patients with CNS metastases were allowed. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to lazertinib 240 mg once daily orally or gefitinib 250 mg once daily orally, stratified by mutation status and race. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST v1.1. RESULTS: Overall, 393 patients received double-blind study treatment across 96 sites in 13 countries. Median PFS was significantly longer with lazertinib than with gefitinib (20.6 v 9.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.58; P < .001). The PFS benefit of lazertinib over gefitinib was consistent across all predefined subgroups. The objective response rate was 76% in both groups (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.59). Median duration of response was 19.4 months (95% CI, 16.6 to 24.9) with lazertinib versus 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 10.9) with gefitinib. Overall survival data were immature at the interim analysis (29% maturity). The 18-month survival rate was 80% with lazertinib and 72% with gefitinib (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.08; P = .116). Observed safety of both treatments was consistent with their previously reported safety profiles. CONCLUSION: Lazertinib demonstrated significant efficacy improvement compared with gefitinib in the first-line treatment of EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, with a manageable safety profile.
dc.identifier.citationJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology Vol.41 No.26 (2023) , 4208-4217
dc.identifier.doi10.1200/JCO.23.00515
dc.identifier.eissn15277755
dc.identifier.pmid37379502
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85170112349
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/90011
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
dc.titleLazertinib Versus Gefitinib as First-Line Treatment in Patients With EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results From LASER301
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85170112349&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage4217
oaire.citation.issue26
oaire.citation.startPage4208
oaire.citation.titleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
oaire.citation.volume41
oairecerif.author.affiliationThe Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationYonsei Cancer Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationChungbuk National University Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationHospital Pulau Pinang
oairecerif.author.affiliationYuhan Corporation
oairecerif.author.affiliationShanghai Chest Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationNational Taiwan University Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationGuangdong Provincial People’s Hospital of Southern Medical University
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad
oairecerif.author.affiliationNational University Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationSamsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan university
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Malaya Medical Centre
oairecerif.author.affiliationSechenov First Moscow State Medical University
oairecerif.author.affiliationTrakya Üniversitesi
oairecerif.author.affiliationSeoul National University College of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationAdana Baskent Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationHospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan

Files

Collections