Lazertinib Versus Gefitinib as First-Line Treatment in Patients With EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results From LASER301
dc.contributor.author | Cho B.C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ahn M.J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kang J.H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Soo R.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Reungwetwattana T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Yang J.C.H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Cicin I. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kim D.W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Wu Y.L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lu S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lee K.H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pang Y.K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Zimina A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Fong C.H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Poddubskaya E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sezer A. | |
dc.contributor.author | How S.H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Danchaivijitr P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kim Y. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lim Y. | |
dc.contributor.author | An T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lee H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Byun H.M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Zaric B. | |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-15T18:01:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-15T18:01:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-09-10 | |
dc.description.abstract | PURPOSE: Lazertinib is a potent, CNS-penetrant, third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor. This global, phase III study (LASER301) compared lazertinib versus gefitinib in treatment-naïve patients with EGFR-mutated (exon 19 deletion [ex19del]/L858R) locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were 18 years and older with no previous systemic anticancer therapy. Neurologically stable patients with CNS metastases were allowed. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to lazertinib 240 mg once daily orally or gefitinib 250 mg once daily orally, stratified by mutation status and race. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST v1.1. RESULTS: Overall, 393 patients received double-blind study treatment across 96 sites in 13 countries. Median PFS was significantly longer with lazertinib than with gefitinib (20.6 v 9.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.58; P < .001). The PFS benefit of lazertinib over gefitinib was consistent across all predefined subgroups. The objective response rate was 76% in both groups (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.59). Median duration of response was 19.4 months (95% CI, 16.6 to 24.9) with lazertinib versus 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 10.9) with gefitinib. Overall survival data were immature at the interim analysis (29% maturity). The 18-month survival rate was 80% with lazertinib and 72% with gefitinib (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.08; P = .116). Observed safety of both treatments was consistent with their previously reported safety profiles. CONCLUSION: Lazertinib demonstrated significant efficacy improvement compared with gefitinib in the first-line treatment of EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, with a manageable safety profile. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology Vol.41 No.26 (2023) , 4208-4217 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1200/JCO.23.00515 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 15277755 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 37379502 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85170112349 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/90011 | |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | |
dc.subject | Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | |
dc.title | Lazertinib Versus Gefitinib as First-Line Treatment in Patients With EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results From LASER301 | |
dc.type | Article | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85170112349&origin=inward | |
oaire.citation.endPage | 4217 | |
oaire.citation.issue | 26 | |
oaire.citation.startPage | 4208 | |
oaire.citation.title | Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology | |
oaire.citation.volume | 41 | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Siriraj Hospital | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Yonsei Cancer Hospital | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Chungbuk National University Hospital | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Hospital Pulau Pinang | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Yuhan Corporation | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Shanghai Chest Hospital | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | National Taiwan University Hospital | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital of Southern Medical University | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | National University Hospital | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan university | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | University of Malaya Medical Centre | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Trakya Üniversitesi | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Seoul National University College of Medicine | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Adana Baskent Hospital | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan |