The Securitization of Social Reintegration in Southern Thailand's Armed Conflict
Issued Date
2024-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
15365581
eISSN
15411508
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85210501112
Journal Title
Conflict Resolution Quarterly
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Conflict Resolution Quarterly (2024)
Suggested Citation
Buranajaroenkij D., Hayes M. The Securitization of Social Reintegration in Southern Thailand's Armed Conflict. Conflict Resolution Quarterly (2024). doi:10.1002/crq.21458 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/102293
Title
The Securitization of Social Reintegration in Southern Thailand's Armed Conflict
Author(s)
Author's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
This study examines the challenges of social reintegration of men involved in the insurgency in the Southernmost provinces of Thailand. Social reintegration involves men taking up their family, economic, and cultural roles in their community. In Southern Thailand, the reintegration process is not adequately desecuritized as the notion of security held by the Thai Military and State clashes with the rights of former detainees accused of involvement in the armed conflict. The data was collected through multiple means, including interviews with 31 informants (comprising former detainees and their family members, authorities, and staff of non-governmental organizations), alongside focus group discussions and a dialogue process. This study shows that social reintegration is complex to achieve when the State pursues a security-centric approach that involves close monitoring and denial of rights of movement and work. The findings of this study illuminate the necessity for three paradigm shifts to improve the social reintegration of former detainees in Thailand's Southern Provinces. First, it urges a redefined threat perception, recognizing former detainees as citizens with rights rather than inherent security risks. Second, it advocates for a collaborative approach, integrating civilian oversight and local stakeholders to reduce tensions and build community trust. Finally, the study proposes adaptive securitization policies responsive to evolving conflict dynamics, allowing for gradual desecuritization as reintegration advances. Together, these shifts aim to balance security needs with effective reintegration, fostering sustainable peace and community resilience in the region.