Comparative Performance of Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid and Colposcopy for Detection of Cervical Precancer in Women with High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infection: A Cross-Sectional Study

dc.contributor.authorKuljarusnont S.
dc.contributor.authorKarnchanabanyong W.
dc.contributor.authorRuengkhachorn I.
dc.contributor.authorUlarnwong M.
dc.contributor.authorIttiamornlert P.
dc.contributor.authorHanamornroongruang S.
dc.contributor.correspondenceKuljarusnont S.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-06T18:10:41Z
dc.date.available2026-02-06T18:10:41Z
dc.date.issued2026-01-01
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The World Health Organization recommends 4 triage strategies for women with high-risk human papillomavirus infection (hrHPV). These include visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), colposcopy, reflex cytology, and HPV16/18 partial genotyping. However, in many low-resource settings, access to colposcopy remains limited. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of visual inspection vs colposcopy for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2<sup>+</sup>). Methods: Women who tested positive for hrHPV and were referred for colposcopy, with cytology results available as part of routine clinical care, underwent visual inspection with 3% acetic acid immediately before colposcopy. Colposcopic impressions were recorded, and images were scored using a modified Reid colposcopic index and a modified Swede score without iodine staining. We compared diagnostic performance for CIN2<sup>+</sup> across visual inspection, colposcopic impression, modified Reid index (score ≥4), and modified Swede score (score ≥5). Statistical analysis used IBM SPSS Statistics and the Cochran Q test, with significance set at P < .05. Results: Among 450 women, the median age was 38.0 years. A single hrHPV type was detected in 70.4% of cases; types 16, 52, and 18 were most common. Histopathological confirmation of CIN2<sup>+</sup> occurred in 97 women (21.6%). Diagnostic accuracy for predicting CIN2<sup>+</sup> was 78.2% with VIA and 77.5% with colposcopic impression. Accuracy was 78.4% for the modified Reid index ≥4 and 78.2% for the modified Swede score ≥5. No significant differences were observed among the 4 methods (P = .941). Conclusions: VIA demonstrates diagnostic accuracy comparable to colposcopy-based assessments in hrHPV-positive women evaluated within a cytology-informed clinical pathway, supporting its potential role in resource-limited settings.
dc.identifier.citationCancer Control Vol.33 (2026)
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/10732748261422014
dc.identifier.eissn15262359
dc.identifier.issn10732748
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105028877002
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/114383
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleComparative Performance of Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid and Colposcopy for Detection of Cervical Precancer in Women with High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infection: A Cross-Sectional Study
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105028877002&origin=inward
oaire.citation.titleCancer Control
oaire.citation.volume33
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital

Files

Collections