Economic Burden of Imaging and Interventions in Endourology: A Worldwide Cost Analysis from European Association of Urology Young Academic Urology Endourology and Urolithiasis Working Party

dc.contributor.authorPietropaolo A.
dc.contributor.authorKeller E.X.
dc.contributor.authorSener T.E.
dc.contributor.authorHamed B.M.Z.
dc.contributor.authorTsaturyan A.
dc.contributor.authorVentimiglia E.
dc.contributor.authorJuliebø-Jones P.
dc.contributor.authorBeisland C.
dc.contributor.authorMikoniatis I.
dc.contributor.authorTzelves L.
dc.contributor.authorDe Coninck V.
dc.contributor.authorPanthier F.
dc.contributor.authorChaloupka M.
dc.contributor.authorBres-Niewada E.
dc.contributor.authordel Rio A.S.
dc.contributor.authorDragos L.
dc.contributor.authorGadzhiev N.
dc.contributor.authorShrestha A.
dc.contributor.authorTursunkulov A.
dc.contributor.authorGhani K.R.
dc.contributor.authorKetsuwan C.
dc.contributor.authorDanilovic A.
dc.contributor.authorPauchard F.
dc.contributor.authorKamkoum H.
dc.contributor.authorCabrera J.
dc.contributor.authorCorrales M.
dc.contributor.authorBarghouthy Y.
dc.contributor.authorKwok J.L.
dc.contributor.authorTokas T.
dc.contributor.authorSolano C.
dc.contributor.authorContreras P.N.
dc.contributor.authorHamri S.B.
dc.contributor.authorBhojani N.
dc.contributor.authorBouma-Houwert A.C.
dc.contributor.authorTailly T.
dc.contributor.authorDurutovic O.
dc.contributor.authorSomani B.K.
dc.contributor.correspondencePietropaolo A.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-09T18:22:16Z
dc.date.available2025-05-09T18:22:16Z
dc.date.issued2025-04-01
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objective: The cost of imaging and interventions in the surgical field varies between countries and sometimes within different regions of the same country. Procedural cost takes into account equipment, consumables, operating room, surgical, anesthetic and nursing teams, radiology, medications, and hospital stay. Health care systems therefore face an incredible burden related to investigations and surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to collect costs of imaging and interventions for kidney calculi across different hospitals and health care systems in the world. Methods: An online shared Google spreadsheet was created by the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urology urolithiasis group. The survey consisted of the cost of four radiological imaging (ultrasound of the urinary tract [USS], plain X-ray radiography of the abdomen including kidneys, ureter, and bladder [XRKUB], noncontrast-enhanced computerized tomography [CTKUB], and contrast-enhanced CT with urographic phase [CTU]) and seven interventions (endoscopic laser treatment of renal stones, ureteroscopic treatment or extraction of ureteral stones, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), insertion of ureteral stent, diagnostic ureteroscopy, and cystolitholapaxy). A chosen representative from each country collected and collated the data, and this was converted to Euros (€). Key Findings and Limitations: Data were collected from 32 countries, which include Turkey, Armenia, Nepal, Uzbekistan, Brazil, Chile, Qatar, Peru, Israel, Singapore, Thailand, Colombia, Argentina, Saudi Arabia, Asia, North America, 15 countries from the European continent, and the United States. The mean cost of USS, XRKUB, CTKUB, and CTU was 51.3 € (range: 2-160 €), 27.1 € (range: 2.5-187 €), 105.8 € (range: 19-405 €), and 171.5 € (range: 19-674 €), respectively. Similarly, the cost of endoscopic laser treatment of renal stones, ureteroscopic treatment/extraction of ureteral stones, PCNL, insertion of ureteral stent, diagnostic ureteroscopy, and cystolitholapaxy was 1942.6 € (range: 100-7887 €), 1626.8 € (range: 80-9787 €), 2884.6 € (range: 110-12642 €), 631 € (range: 110-2787 €), 861.6 € (range: 3-2667 €), and 876 € (range: 19-3457 €), respectively. Wide differences in cost between countries were found within the study. Conclusions and Clinical Implications: This study highlights the significant economic impact of kidney stone management on health care systems worldwide. There seem to be significant disparities between costs, and this study shows the social and economic inequalities in health care access, which can differ significantly between private and public health care. These results can aid policymakers to address these disparities and perhaps to learn from other health care providers.
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Endourology Vol.39 No.4 (2025) , 389-398
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/end.2024.0673
dc.identifier.eissn1557900X
dc.identifier.issn08927790
dc.identifier.pmid40019809
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-86000608864
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/109969
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleEconomic Burden of Imaging and Interventions in Endourology: A Worldwide Cost Analysis from European Association of Urology Young Academic Urology Endourology and Urolithiasis Working Party
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=86000608864&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage398
oaire.citation.issue4
oaire.citation.startPage389
oaire.citation.titleJournal of Endourology
oaire.citation.volume39
oairecerif.author.affiliationSaint-Petersburg State University Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationFr. Muller Medical College Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationHamad Medical Corporation
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitair Ziekenhuis Gent
oairecerif.author.affiliationHôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou
oairecerif.author.affiliationHospital Clínic de Barcelona
oairecerif.author.affiliationHaukeland Universitetssjukehus
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitetet i Bergen
oairecerif.author.affiliationNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens
oairecerif.author.affiliationAlgemeen Ziekenhuis Klina
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor
oairecerif.author.affiliationIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele
oairecerif.author.affiliationAP-HP Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris
oairecerif.author.affiliationHospital Naval Almirante Nef
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitatsSpital Zurich
oairecerif.author.affiliationCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
oairecerif.author.affiliationUczelnia Łazarskiego
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationAristotle University of Thessaloniki
oairecerif.author.affiliationHeraklion University Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Montreal
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversidade de São Paulo
oairecerif.author.affiliationHospital Aleman
oairecerif.author.affiliationMarmara Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversiteit van Amsterdam
oairecerif.author.affiliationTan Tock Seng Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationSorbonne Université
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
oairecerif.author.affiliationKlinikum der Universität München
oairecerif.author.affiliationNational Academy of Medical Sciences
oairecerif.author.affiliationUrology Department at Specialized Medical Center SMC2 Riyadh Saudi Arabia
oairecerif.author.affiliationClinic of Urology UCCS
oairecerif.author.affiliationUroclin SAS Medellin
oairecerif.author.affiliationAkfaMedline Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationJavier Prado Clinic
oairecerif.author.affiliationErebouni Medical Center

Files

Collections