Consumer Understanding, Preferences, and Acceptance of Front-of-Pack Labels in Thailand: Foundational Evidence for Policy Development

dc.contributor.authorPhonsuk P.
dc.contributor.authorCurtis C.J.
dc.contributor.authorPhatchana P.
dc.contributor.authorPongutta S.
dc.contributor.correspondencePhonsuk P.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-06T18:26:32Z
dc.date.available2026-02-06T18:26:32Z
dc.date.issued2026-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study aimed to assess the understanding, perceptions, and preferences of different front-of-pack labeling (FOPL) formats among Thai consumers. Design: We conducted a mixed-methods study comprising a cross-sectional online survey and semi-structured interviews between February -March 2022. The survey assessed comprehension and preferences for six FOPL formats (Guideline Daily Amounts (GDA), Healthier Choice logo (HCL), Warning Labels (WLs), Nutri-Score, Health Star Rating (HSR), and Traffic Light labels (TLL)). Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and multiple logistic regression. Qualitative data underwent thematic analysis. Setting: Bangkok and metropolitan areas Participants: Thai residents aged 12-78 years (n=410) Results: While awareness of existing labels was high (GDA: 95.4%, HCL: 82.4%), only 23.9% regularly read GDA labels. WLs and Nutri-Score were the most effective at providing information to consumers in a format that translated into choosing healthier products. WLs demonstrated the highest effectiveness in guiding healthier choices. HCL received the highest agreement across multiple attributes, including packaging inclusion preference (59.8%), visibility (58.5%), and visual appeal (57.3%), although effectiveness was not tested. Qualitative findings revealed preferences for color-coded systems but identified barriers including time constraints, small font sizes, and difficulty interpreting numerical information. Conclusions: While interpretive labels, particularly warning labels, are most effective for guiding consumers to healthier choices, successful implementation requires consideration of both consumer preferences and real-world usage constraints. Findings support replacing the current GDA system with an interpretive design, accompanied by comprehensive public education campaigns. These results provide evidence-based recommendations for FOPL policy development in Thailand.
dc.identifier.citationPublic Health Nutrition (2026)
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1368980026101852
dc.identifier.eissn14752727
dc.identifier.issn13689800
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105028292191
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/114670
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectNursing
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleConsumer Understanding, Preferences, and Acceptance of Front-of-Pack Labels in Thailand: Foundational Evidence for Policy Development
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105028292191&origin=inward
oaire.citation.titlePublic Health Nutrition
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationResolve to Save Lives
oairecerif.author.affiliationInternational Health Policy Program

Files

Collections