Lung Ultrasound Estimates the Overhydration and Benefits Blood Pressure Control in Normal or Mild Symptomatic Hemodialysis Patients
Issued Date
2022-01-01
Resource Type
eISSN
11787058
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85144278418
Journal Title
International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease
Volume
15
Start Page
383
End Page
395
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease Vol.15 (2022) , 383-395
Suggested Citation
Trirattanapikul A. Lung Ultrasound Estimates the Overhydration and Benefits Blood Pressure Control in Normal or Mild Symptomatic Hemodialysis Patients. International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease Vol.15 (2022) , 383-395. 395. doi:10.2147/IJNRD.S374569 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/87398
Title
Lung Ultrasound Estimates the Overhydration and Benefits Blood Pressure Control in Normal or Mild Symptomatic Hemodialysis Patients
Author(s)
Author's Affiliation
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Introduction: Lung ultrasound (LUS) is used for dry weight guidance by assessment of pulmonary congestion in hemodialysis (HD) patients. The aim of this study was to estimate amounts of accumulated fluid by total LUS scores (TLUSS), which were scarcely reported in HD patients who were normal or had a mild functional abnormality. In addition, the correlations between the LUS score of each area and TLUSS were determined to suggest fewer specific areas valuable to shorten the examination time of LUS. Methods: This cohort study was conducted in adult HD patients who have New York Heart Association Classes I–II. LUS and multifrequency bioimpedance (BIA) were performed at baseline and the individual prescribed dry weight was set. Then each LUS was conducted at 28 areas of bilateral intercostal spaces and calculated as TLUSS weekly for eight weeks in which dry weight was adjusted. The second BIA was also measured at week eight. The difference of pre-HD weight and target weight (weight gain; WG) represented the amount of fluid accumulation. Results: Twenty patients with a mean age of 62.2±14.0 years were enrolled. One hundred and sixty-six LUS were performed in which forty episodes of them were simultaneously measured with BIA. Optimum dry weight adjusted by TLUSS which benefited in mean reductions of blood pressure, and cardiothoracic ratios. WG amounts were significantly correlated with TLUSS (r=0.38), and with extracellular fluid (r=0.35) and overhydration fluid (r=0.39) assessed by BIA. Estimations of mean fluid overload were 2.18 (TLUSS ≤15), 2.72 (TLUSS 16–24), 3.17 (TLUSS 25–33), 3.65 (TLUSS 34–38) and 5.03 (TLUSS ≥39) in liters. The cut-off points of sum scores of 12 specific lung areas represented the none-mild were <8, moderate at 8–16, and severe pulmonary congestions were >16. Conclusion: TLUSS estimated accumulated fluid useful for volume and blood pressure controls. Performance of LUS in 12 specific lung areas may reduce spending time and support routine uses of LUS in clinical practice.