Asia-Pacific survey of physicians' perceptions and managements of chronic rhinosinusitis
Issued Date
2025-03-01
Resource Type
ISSN
0125877X
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105001219288
Pubmed ID
35598189
Journal Title
Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology
Volume
43
Issue
1
Start Page
84
End Page
92
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology Vol.43 No.1 (2025) , 84-92
Suggested Citation
Shao S., Zheng M., Wang X., Latiff A.H., Kim D.Y., Wang J.Y., Recto M., Lucas M., Sonomjamts M., Logi N., Lestari N., Irawati N., Tantilipikorn P., Bhargava S., Ms S., Shimizu T., Leung T.F., Kamchaisatian W., Pawankar R., Zhang L. Asia-Pacific survey of physicians' perceptions and managements of chronic rhinosinusitis. Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology Vol.43 No.1 (2025) , 84-92. 92. doi:10.12932/AP-130122-1302 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/109300
Title
Asia-Pacific survey of physicians' perceptions and managements of chronic rhinosinusitis
Author's Affiliation
Siriraj Hospital
UWA Medical School
Kansai Rosai Hospital
Beijing YouAn Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing Institute of Otorhinolaryngology
Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University
National Cheng Kung University Hospital
Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences
Philippine General Hospital
Universitas Indonesia, RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital
Prince of Wales Hospital Hong Kong
Bangkok Children's Hospital
St. John's National Academy Of Health Sciences India
Nippon Medical School
Lokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital
Pantai Holdings Sdn Bhd
Seoul National University College of Medicine
Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences: Ulaanbaatar
Awal Bros Hospital
UWA Medical School
Kansai Rosai Hospital
Beijing YouAn Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing Institute of Otorhinolaryngology
Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University
National Cheng Kung University Hospital
Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences
Philippine General Hospital
Universitas Indonesia, RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital
Prince of Wales Hospital Hong Kong
Bangkok Children's Hospital
St. John's National Academy Of Health Sciences India
Nippon Medical School
Lokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital
Pantai Holdings Sdn Bhd
Seoul National University College of Medicine
Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences: Ulaanbaatar
Awal Bros Hospital
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis and management of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) may vary between otolaryngologists and allergists. Moreover, the adherence of different practitioners to European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS) 2020 guideline recommendations has not been previously ascertained in Asia-Pacific regions. OBJECTIVE: Different specialists' perceptions and managements of CRS in Asia-Pacific regions were assessed in an attempt to gauge these practices against EPOS 2020 guidelines. METHODS: A transregional, cross-sectional survey was conducted to assess otolaryngologists' and allergists' perceptions and managements of CRS with regard to diagnosis, management and adherence to EPOS 2020 guidelines. RESULTS: Sixteen physicians in Asia-Pacific regions responded to the questionnaire. A total of 71.4% of otolaryngologists preferred to diagnose CRS with a combination of positive nasal symptoms and nasal endoscopy plus sinus CT, whereas 22.2% of allergists took such criterion to diagnose CRS. Compared to allergists, otolaryngologists more often considered the endotype classification (85.8% versus 55.5%). For the preferred first-line treatment, in addition to intranasal corticosteroids recommended by all respondents, 66.7% of allergists preferred antihistamines, whereas 71.4% of otolaryngologists preferred nasal saline irrigation. Regarding the proper timing of surgery, 71.5% of otolaryngologists reported 8-12 weeks of treatment after the initiation of medication, while more than half of the allergists recommended 4-6 weeks of medical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This survey shows that variable perceptions and practices for CRS may exist between physicians with different specialties and highlights the need for increased communication and awareness between otolaryngologists and allergists to improve the diagnosis and treatment of CRS.
