Publication: The association of buccal keratinized tissue width and periodontal biotype on soft tissue surrounding dental implant.
Accepted Date
2014-08-07
Issued Date
2014-09
Resource Type
Language
eng
ISSN
0125-5614 (printed)
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
Faculty of Dentistry Mahidol University
Bibliographic Citation
Amponpan N, Kuphasuk R, Kuphassuk Y, Kerdvongbundit V. The association of buccal keratinized tissue width and periodontal biotype on soft tissue surrounding dental implant. M Dent J. 2014; 34(3): 311-20.
Suggested Citation
Nattinee Amponpan, Ratchanee Kuphasuk, รัชนี คูผาสุข, Yosvimol Kuphasuk, ยศวิมล คูผาสุข, Varunee Kerdvongbundit, วรุณี เกิดวงศ์บัณฑิต The association of buccal keratinized tissue width and periodontal biotype on soft tissue surrounding dental implant.. Amponpan N, Kuphasuk R, Kuphassuk Y, Kerdvongbundit V. The association of buccal keratinized tissue width and periodontal biotype on soft tissue surrounding dental implant. M Dent J. 2014; 34(3): 311-20.. Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/1068
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
The association of buccal keratinized tissue width and periodontal biotype on soft tissue surrounding dental implant.
Corresponding Author(s)
Abstract
Objectives: To compare clinical outcomes surrounding dental implants
between narrow and wide buccal keratinized tissue and between thin and
thick periodontal biotype.
Materials and methods: Fifty one patients recruited from the patient’s bank
of Oral medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of dentistry, Mahidol University.
Eighty two functioning dental implants were examined. All implants mucosa
were divided into 2categories: 1) keratinized mucosal width was divided into
wide (≥ 2 mm) and narrow (< 2 mm), 2) keratinized mucosal thickness was
divided into thick and thin. Clinical parameters included gingival index (GI),
plaque index (PI), bleeding index (BI), probing depth (PD), buccal mucosal
recession and periodontal attachment were determined. Peri-implant
crevicular fluid was collected for measurement by periotron.
Results: The implant areas that had thick or wide mucosa showed more
probing depth than those that had thin or narrow mucosa, significantly (P=
0.001, P=0.008, in order). The periotron value in thin or narrow mucosa had
significantly greater than thick or wide mucosal sites (P=0.016, 0.042 orderly).
There was no correlation between keratinized tissue thickness or width and GI,
BI and PI. Thin mucosa tend to occur buccal recession than thick mucosa, but
not significant though.
Conclusion: The finding of this study showed that keratinized mucosal
thickness and width surrounding implants affected the peri-implant soft tissue
status.