Tixagevimab-cilgavimab for preventing breakthrough COVID-19 in dialysis patients: a prospective study

dc.contributor.authorBoongird S.
dc.contributor.authorSrithongkul T.
dc.contributor.authorSethakarun S.
dc.contributor.authorBruminhent J.
dc.contributor.authorKiertiburanakul S.
dc.contributor.authorNongnuch A.
dc.contributor.authorKitiyakara C.
dc.contributor.authorSritippayawan S.
dc.contributor.correspondenceBoongird S.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-26T18:11:50Z
dc.date.available2024-11-26T18:11:50Z
dc.date.issued2024-11-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: The effectiveness of tixagevimab-cilgavimab as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) against breakthrough coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in dialysis patients remains uncertain due to limited data. Methods: In this multicenter prospective study, we enrolled vaccinated dialysis patients and divided them into two groups: a tixagevimab-cilgavimab group (received a 150 mg/150 mg intramuscular dose of tixagevimab-cilgavimab) and a control group (age-matched patients not receiving tixagevimab-cilgavimab). The primary outcome was the breakthrough COVID-19 rate at 6 months, whereas secondary outcomes included COVID-19-related hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, endotracheal intubation and mortality. The safety of tixagevimab-cilgavimab was assessed. Results: Two hundred participants were enrolled, with equal numbers in each group (n = 100 each). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups, except for a higher number of COVID-19 vaccine doses in the tixagevimab-cilgavimab group [median (IQR) 4 (3-5) vs. 3 (3-4); P =. 01]. At 6 months, the breakthrough COVID-19 rates were comparable between the tixagevimab-cilgavimab (17%) and control (15%) groups (P =. 66). However, the median (IQR) time to diagnosis of breakthrough infections tended to be longer in the tixagevimab-cilgavimab group [4.49 (2.81-4.98) vs 1.96 (1.65-2.91) months; P =. 08]. Tixagevimab-cilgavimab significantly reduced COVID-19-related hospitalization rates (5.9% vs 40.0%; P =. 02) among participants with breakthrough infections. All tixagevimab-cilgavimab-related adverse events were mild. Conclusion: The use of tixagevimab-cilgavimab as PrEP in vaccinated dialysis patients during the Omicron surge did not prevent breakthrough infections but significantly reduced COVID-19-related hospitalizations. Further research should prioritize alternative strategies.
dc.identifier.citationClinical Kidney Journal Vol.17 No.11 (2024)
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ckj/sfae309
dc.identifier.eissn20488513
dc.identifier.issn20488505
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85209642953
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/102180
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleTixagevimab-cilgavimab for preventing breakthrough COVID-19 in dialysis patients: a prospective study
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85209642953&origin=inward
oaire.citation.issue11
oaire.citation.titleClinical Kidney Journal
oaire.citation.volume17
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationBhumirajanagarindra Kidney Institute

Files

Collections