Rituximab in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorIntarakhao P.
dc.contributor.authorLaipasu T.
dc.contributor.authorJitprapaikulsan J.
dc.contributor.authorApiraksattayakul N.
dc.contributor.authorKosiyakul P.
dc.contributor.authorSiritho S.
dc.contributor.authorPrayoonwiwat N.
dc.contributor.authorOngphichetmetha T.
dc.contributor.correspondenceIntarakhao P.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-31T18:24:43Z
dc.date.available2024-08-31T18:24:43Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the efficacy of rituximab (RTX) in stabilizing disability progression in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). Methods: A systematic review was conducted, encompassing studies from inception to April 2023, utilizing the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Inclusion criteria comprised studies with a minimum of 3 SPMS patients receiving intravenous RTX in at least one infusion, with a follow-up duration of at least 6 months. Primary outcome measures included changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores. Mean differences in pre- and post-RTX EDSS scores were analyzed using a random-effects model. Meta-regression examined age at RTX initiation, pre-RTX EDSS scores, disease duration, and outcome reported time as variables. Secondary outcomes assessed changes in the annualized relapse rate (ARR). Results: Thirteen studies, involving 604 SPMS patients, met the inclusion criteria. Following a mean follow-up of 2 years, the mean difference in EDSS scores (ΔEDSS = EDSSpre-RTX − EDSSpost-RTX) was −0.21 (95% CI −0.51 to 0.08, p = 0.16), indicating no significant variation. Multivariable meta-regression identified significant associations between EDSS score mean difference and pre-RTX EDSS scores, disease duration at RTX initiation, and outcome reported time. However, age at RTX initiation showed no significant association. Pre- and post-RTX ARR data were available for 245 out of 604 SPMS patients across seven studies, revealing a mean difference in ARR (ΔARR = ARRpre-RTX − ARRpost-RTX) of 0.74 (95% CI 0.19–1.29, p = 0.008). Interpretation: RTX demonstrates efficacy in reducing relapse frequency and exhibits potential in stabilizing disability progression over a 2-year follow-up, particularly among individuals with shorter disease duration.
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of Clinical and Translational Neurology (2024)
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/acn3.52186
dc.identifier.eissn23289503
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85202079565
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/100677
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectNeuroscience
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleRituximab in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85202079565&origin=inward
oaire.citation.titleAnnals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationBumrungrad International Hospital

Files

Collections