News and Perspectives: Words matter in primatology

dc.contributor.authorBezanson M.
dc.contributor.authorCortés-Ortiz L.
dc.contributor.authorBicca-Marques J.C.
dc.contributor.authorBoonratana R.
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho S.
dc.contributor.authorCords M.
dc.contributor.authorde la Torre S.
dc.contributor.authorHobaiter C.
dc.contributor.authorHumle T.
dc.contributor.authorIzar P.
dc.contributor.authorLynch J.W.
dc.contributor.authorMatsuzawa T.
dc.contributor.authorSetchell J.M.
dc.contributor.authorZikusoka G.K.
dc.contributor.authorStrier K.B.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-16T18:01:01Z
dc.date.available2023-12-16T18:01:01Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractPostings on social media on Twitter (now X), BioAnthropology News (Facebook), and other venues, as well as recent publications in prominent journals, show that primatologists, ecologists, and other researchers are questioning the terms “Old World” and “New World” due to their colonial implications and history. The terms are offensive if they result in erasing Indigenous voices and history, ignoring the fact that Indigenous peoples were in the Americas long before European colonization. Language use is not without context, but alternative terminology is not always obvious and available. In this perspective, we share opinions expressed by an international group of primatologists who considered questions about the use of these terms, whether primatologists should adjust language use, and how to move forward. The diversity of opinions provides insight into how conventional terms used in primatological research and conservation may impact our effectiveness in these domains.
dc.identifier.citationPrimates (2023)
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10329-023-01104-6
dc.identifier.eissn16107365
dc.identifier.issn00328332
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85178224704
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/91491
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciences
dc.titleNews and Perspectives: Words matter in primatology
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85178224704&origin=inward
oaire.citation.titlePrimates
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Social Sciences & Health
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversidad San Francisco de Quito
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison
oairecerif.author.affiliationCalifornia Institute of Technology
oairecerif.author.affiliationColumbia University
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of California, Los Angeles
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Oxford
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of St Andrews
oairecerif.author.affiliationPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Kent
oairecerif.author.affiliationSanta Clara University
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversidade de São Paulo
oairecerif.author.affiliationChubu Gakuin University & College
oairecerif.author.affiliationNorthwest University
oairecerif.author.affiliationGorongosa National Park
oairecerif.author.affiliationConservation Through Public Health

Files

Collections