Analysis of Soft Tissue Healing Over Socket Orifice Sealed with Platelet-Rich Fibrin Membrane
Issued Date
2025-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
13057456
eISSN
13057464
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105020180542
Journal Title
European Journal of Dentistry
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
European Journal of Dentistry (2025)
Suggested Citation
Manlerd R., Jirajariyavej B., Ruangsawasdi N., Thanasrisuebwong P. Analysis of Soft Tissue Healing Over Socket Orifice Sealed with Platelet-Rich Fibrin Membrane. European Journal of Dentistry (2025). doi:10.1055/s-0045-1812061 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/112913
Title
Analysis of Soft Tissue Healing Over Socket Orifice Sealed with Platelet-Rich Fibrin Membrane
Author's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Objective Socket sealing is a technique for alveolar ridge preservation following tooth extraction. Leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF), an autologous platelet-derived material rich in growth factors, is used to support healing. However, its benefits for soft tissue healing compared with collagen sponge or spontaneous healing remain unclear. This study evaluated soft tissue healing outcomes, wound margin distance, inflammation, postoperative pain, and wound closure area, among sockets treated with L-PRF membrane, collagen sponge, or spontaneous healing. Materials and Methods A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 45 extraction sites at the Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. Sockets were randomly assigned to L-PRF sealing, collagen sponge sealing, or spontaneous healing. Primary outcomes included wound margin distance reduction percentage, soft tissue healing index, and postoperative pain. The secondary outcome was wound closure area reduction percentage between the L-PRF and collagen sponge groups. Measurements were recorded postoperatively and on days 7, 14, and 21. Pain scores were recorded daily for 1 week. Age, sex, tooth position, and arch were evaluated as covariates. Statistical Analysis One-way ANOVA with least significant difference post-hoc test was used for primary outcomes, and an independent t-test was used for secondary outcomes (p < 0.05). Results Forty-five teeth were enrolled. Three teeth from the collagen sponge group were excluded due to infection and loss to follow-up; three additional teeth were recruited using the original allocation and randomization protocol. On day 7, L-PRF showed a significantly superior soft tissue healing index than collagen sponge (p ¼ 0.002, 95% CI: [0.28, 1.18]) and spontaneous healing (p ¼ 0.002, 95% CI: [0.28, 1.18]). On day 5, L-PRF reduced pain more than collagen sponge (p ¼ 0.036, 95% CI: [0.04, 1.03]) and spontaneous healing (p ¼ 0.026, 95% CI: [0.07, 1.06]). No significant differences in wound closure distance reduction percentage or wound area reduction percentage were observed among the groups. Conclusion L-PRF improved soft tissue healing and reduced postoperative pain within the first week, but showed no added benefit in wound closure compared with collagen sponge or spontaneous healing. L-PRF may support short-term symptom relief but not enhanced post-extraction soft tissue regeneration at the clinical relevance level.