Comparative biomechanical performance of two configurations of screw constructs and types used to stabilize different sites of unstable Pauwels type II femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis
Issued Date
2022-09-01
Resource Type
ISSN
13504533
eISSN
18734030
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85134880170
Pubmed ID
36068038
Journal Title
Medical Engineering and Physics
Volume
107
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Medical Engineering and Physics Vol.107 (2022)
Suggested Citation
Chantarapanich N., Jitprapaikulsarn S., Mahaisavariya B., Mahaisavariya C. Comparative biomechanical performance of two configurations of screw constructs and types used to stabilize different sites of unstable Pauwels type II femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis. Medical Engineering and Physics Vol.107 (2022). doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103856 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/84585
Title
Comparative biomechanical performance of two configurations of screw constructs and types used to stabilize different sites of unstable Pauwels type II femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis
Author's Affiliation
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: A smaller dimension of the femoral neck in the Asian population may have difficulty placing inverted triangle multiple screws configuration for treatment. Posterior triangle configuration, which is suitable in limited space of the femoral neck, is a promising alternative treatment approach. This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical performance of inverted and posterior triangles of multiple screws fixation configuration for both cannulated and standard solid-core screws in stabilizing Pauwels type II femoral neck fracture sub-capital, mid-cervical, and basilar regions using Finite Element (FE) method. Methods: A 3D femur model was created for Pauwels type II femoral neck fractures. The fracture sites were in the mid-cervical, sub-capital, and basilar regions, with a spacing of 7 mm between adjacent fracture lines. Both cannulated and solid-core screws were configured in the inverted and posterior triangle patterns. The applied physiological loads to the FE models included muscle and hip contact forces. Equivalent von Mises (EQV) stresses were used to monitor fixation strength whereas elastic strain of each configuration indicated the degree of stability of a fracture site. Results: EQV stress on the screws for posterior and inverted triangle configuration ranged from 212.1 to 290.2 MPa, and 224.4–314.8 MPa, respectively The EQV stress the posterior triangle configuration was lower than the inverted triangle configuration by 5.5–10.8%. The stress exhibited on the screw was greatest when the fracture site was at basilar regions, 1.1–1.3 times greater than fracture in sub-capital region. Elastic strain at fractures retained by cannulated screw was greater than solid-core screw with maximum difference of 68 microstrains. Cannulated screw provided less stability than the solid-core screw. Conclusions: The screws used in the posterior triangle configuration exhibits lower screw stress in all fracture regions of the femoral neck. The solid-core screw shows superior biomechanical properties compared with cannulated screw with lower EQV stress and better fracture stability. Posterior triangle configuration is considered an alternative treatment of choice for the patient with a small dimension of the femoral neck.