Field assessment of the operating procedures of a semi-quantitative G6PD Biosensor to improve repeatability of routine testing

dc.contributor.authorSadhewa A.
dc.contributor.authorChaudhary A.
dc.contributor.authorPanggalo L.V.
dc.contributor.authorRumaseb A.
dc.contributor.authorAdhikari N.
dc.contributor.authorAdhikari S.
dc.contributor.authorRijal K.R.
dc.contributor.authorBanjara M.R.
dc.contributor.authorPrice R.N.
dc.contributor.authorThriemer K.
dc.contributor.authorGhimire P.
dc.contributor.authorLey B.
dc.contributor.authorSatyagraha A.W.
dc.contributor.correspondenceSadhewa A.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-08T18:08:35Z
dc.date.available2024-02-08T18:08:35Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.description.abstractIn remote communities, diagnosis of G6PD deficiency is challenging. We assessed the impact of modified test procedures and delayed testing for the point-of-care diagnostic STANDARD G6PD (SDBiosensor, RoK), and evaluated recommended cut-offs. We tested capillary blood from fingerpricks (Standard Method) and a microtainer (BD, USA; Method 1), venous blood from a vacutainer (BD, USA; Method 2), varied sample application methods (Methods 3), and used micropipettes rather than the test's single-use pipette (Method 4). Repeatability was assessed by comparing median differences between paired measurements. All methods were tested 20 times under laboratory conditions on three volunteers. The Standard Method and the method with best repeatability were tested in Indonesia and Nepal. In Indonesia 60 participants were tested in duplicate by both methods, in Nepal 120 participants were tested in duplicate by either method. The adjusted male median (AMM) of the Biosensor Standard Method readings was defined as 100% activity. In Indonesia, the difference between paired readings of the Standard and modified methods was compared to assess the impact of delayed testing. In the pilot study repeatability didn't differ significantly (p = 0.381); Method 3 showed lowest variability. One Nepalese participant had <30% activity, one Indonesian and 10 Nepalese participants had intermediate activity (≥30% to <70% activity). Repeatability didn't differ significantly in Indonesia (Standard: 0.2U/gHb [IQR: 0.1-0.4]; Method 3: 0.3U/gHb [IQR: 0.1-0.5]; p = 0.425) or Nepal (Standard: 0.4U/gHb [IQR: 0.2-0.6]; Method 3: 0.3U/gHb [IQR: 0.1-0.6]; p = 0.330). Median G6PD measurements by Method 3 were 0.4U/gHb (IQR: -0.2 to 0.7, p = 0.005) higher after a 5-hour delay compared to the Standard Method. The definition of 100% activity by the Standard Method matched the manufacturer-recommended cut-off for 70% activity. We couldn't improve repeatability. Delays of up to 5 hours didn't result in a clinically relevant difference in measured G6PD activity. The manufacturer's recommended cut-off for intermediate deficiency is conservative.
dc.identifier.citationPloS one Vol.19 No.1 (2024) , e0296708
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0296708
dc.identifier.eissn19326203
dc.identifier.pmid38241389
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85182855022
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/95587
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMultidisciplinary
dc.titleField assessment of the operating procedures of a semi-quantitative G6PD Biosensor to improve repeatability of routine testing
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85182855022&origin=inward
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.titlePloS one
oaire.citation.volume19
oairecerif.author.affiliationBadan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit
oairecerif.author.affiliationTribhuvan University
oairecerif.author.affiliationMenzies School of Health Research
oairecerif.author.affiliationNuffield Department of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationExeins Health Initiative

Files

Collections