Microwave Oven vs Level-1 Rapid Fluid Warmer: A Comparative Efficacy Study of Fluid Warming in the ATLS Protocol (MOLEWA Study)
2
Issued Date
2025-09-01
Resource Type
eISSN
22288082
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105016242163
Journal Title
Siriraj Medical Journal
Volume
77
Issue
9
Start Page
660
End Page
667
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Siriraj Medical Journal Vol.77 No.9 (2025) , 660-667
Suggested Citation
Aimpopukdee V., Maliwan S., Boonyasiri A., Wongpongsalee T., Siritongtaworn C., Chunhasuwankul R., Owattanapanich N. Microwave Oven vs Level-1 Rapid Fluid Warmer: A Comparative Efficacy Study of Fluid Warming in the ATLS Protocol (MOLEWA Study). Siriraj Medical Journal Vol.77 No.9 (2025) , 660-667. 667. doi:10.33192/smj.v77i9.276168 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/112175
Title
Microwave Oven vs Level-1 Rapid Fluid Warmer: A Comparative Efficacy Study of Fluid Warming in the ATLS Protocol (MOLEWA Study)
Author's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Objective: Although the use of a microwave for fluid warming has been proposed, standardized protocols for it clinical application remain limited. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of microwave-base fluid warming compared to conventional fluid warming equipment. Materials and Methods: This in-vitro experimental study was conducted in two phases. In the pilot trial, w compared five groups using different combinations of container types, infusion rates, and warming techniques. I the second phase, a non-inferiority trial, two groups of 18 1-liter isotonic crystalloid bottles were compared: on using the Level-1 H-1200 fluid warmer and the other employing a microwave oven warming protocol (800W, tw minutes at maximum power). The primary outcome was the percentage of infusion time during which the flui temperature at the tip of the infusion set remained within the target range of 37°C to 42°C. Results: The warming cabinet and microwave oven achieved mean infusion durations of 5.0 and 19.5 minutes respectively. The Level-1 group maintained the target temperature for 100% of the infusion duration, while th microwave group achieved a rate of 95.84% [95.82%-95.86%], demonstrating non-inferiority to the Level-1 method Conclusion: Microwave fluid warming is a feasible, practical, and cost-effective alternative to conventional flui warming equipment. Its comparable warming efficiency and wide availability support its potential use in rura areas with limited resources.