Refining index to measure physical activity inequality: which group of the population is the most vulnerable?
Issued Date
2022-12-01
Resource Type
eISSN
14759276
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85137069822
Pubmed ID
36045368
Journal Title
International Journal for Equity in Health
Volume
21
Issue
1
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
International Journal for Equity in Health Vol.21 No.1 (2022)
Suggested Citation
Widyastari D.A., Khanawapee A., Charoenrom W., Saonuam P., Katewongsa P. Refining index to measure physical activity inequality: which group of the population is the most vulnerable?. International Journal for Equity in Health Vol.21 No.1 (2022). doi:10.1186/s12939-022-01725-1 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/85267
Title
Refining index to measure physical activity inequality: which group of the population is the most vulnerable?
Author's Affiliation
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: The existing body of research mostly discusses inequality in physical activity (PA) based on the difference in the level of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Evidence is lacking on the quantified inequality measures (e.g., how big the inequality is, and the distribution) in order to identify the most vulnerable groups of a population. This study measured PA inequality among Thai adults by using three parameters to construct an inequality index: (1) Proportion of the population with sufficient MVPA; (2) Cumulative minutes of MVPA; and (3) The Gini coefficient. Methods: This study employed three rounds of data from Thailand’s Surveillance on Physical Activity (SPA) 2019–2021. In each round, over 6,000 individuals age 18–64 years were selected as nationally-representative samples, and were included in the analysis. PA inequality was constructed by using three parameters, with a combination of the three as the final measure, to identify the sub-groups of the Thai adults who are most vulnerable: groups with the least MVPA, highest insufficiency, and highest inequality index (Gini). Results: Covid-19 containment measures have widened the gap in PA inequality, as shown by a declining proportion of the population meeting the recommended guidelines, from 74.3% in 2019 to 56.7% in 2020 and 65.5% in 2021. PA inequality existed in all sub-populations. However, by combining three parameters, the most vulnerable groups during the Covid-19 epidemic were identified as follows: (1) Those with no income; (2) The unemployed; (3) Those who have no access to PA facilities; (4) Older adults aged 60 + years; and (5) Those earning < 3,500 baht per month. Further, residents of Bangkok, young adults aged 18–24, individuals who attained primary level education or less, those who had no exposure to a PA awareness campaign and those who have a debilitating chronic disease also had elevated risk of PA insufficiency. Conclusion: A concerning level of PA inequality existed in all sub-populations. The use of combined indicators in measuring PA inequality should aid in determining the most vulnerable groups of the population with a refined procedure. This method can be applied in many settings since the baseline data used to measure inequality (i.e., percent sufficient and cumulative minutes of MVPA) are widely available.