Subtype prevalence and treatment implication in adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma: Systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorWongsa C.
dc.contributor.authorWongyikul P.
dc.contributor.authorChokevittaya P.
dc.contributor.authorNititammaluk A.
dc.contributor.authorSoe K.K.
dc.contributor.authorPhinyo P.
dc.contributor.authorBernstein J.A.
dc.contributor.authorThongngarm T.
dc.contributor.correspondenceWongsa C.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-23T18:10:42Z
dc.date.available2025-01-23T18:10:42Z
dc.date.issued2025-02-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-containing regimens are the mainstay for treating asthma despite usually being ineffective in noneosinophilic asthma (NEA). Data on the prevalence of NEA versus eosinophilic asthma (EA) in mild-to-moderate asthma are limited. Objective: We performed a systematic review of the prevalence of mild-to-moderate asthma in adolescents and adults using sputum inflammatory cell analysis and their responses to ICS. Methods: We searched electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane) for studies in adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma. The primary outcome was the prevalence of asthma subtypes based on sputum inflammatory cell analysis, categorized into EA and NEA. The secondary outcome involved comparing asthma outcomes between different subtypes after ICS therapy. Certainty of evidence was reported for each pooled analysis. Results: Eighteen studies involving 3,533 adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma were reviewed. The pooled prevalence (95% confidence interval) of NEA was estimated at 40.39% (27.54, 53.93) in patients with ICS naive with very low certainty of evidence. On reevaluating sputum cytology, the disease of approximately 20% to 30% of patients initially diagnosed as NEA transitioned to the EA subtype. EA patients showed significant improvements in asthma symptoms after ICS therapy: forced expiratory volume in 1 second (standardized mean difference, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.30, 1.27), and airway hyperresponsiveness (standardized mean difference, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.29, 2.40). NEA patients exhibited limited response. Conclusion: A high proportion of adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma were identified with NEA subtype disease, which exhibited a poor response to ICS. A thorough diagnostic evaluation before initiating treatment should be integrated into clinical practice. Registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023484334)
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: Global Vol.4 No.1 (2025)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100366
dc.identifier.eissn27728293
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85209747542
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/102716
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleSubtype prevalence and treatment implication in adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma: Systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85209747542&origin=inward
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.titleJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: Global
oaire.citation.volume4
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationChiang Mai University

Files

Collections