CT of appendicoliths in adult appendicitis: clinical significance and characteristics of overlooked cases
Issued Date
2023-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
09387994
eISSN
14321084
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85174178492
Pubmed ID
37837538
Journal Title
European Radiology
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
European Radiology (2023)
Suggested Citation
Kaewlai R., Wongveerasin P., Lekanamongkol W., Wongsaengchan D., Teerasamit W., Tongsai S., Khamman P., Chatkaewpaisal A., Noppakunsomboon N., Apisarnthanarak P. CT of appendicoliths in adult appendicitis: clinical significance and characteristics of overlooked cases. European Radiology (2023). doi:10.1007/s00330-023-10273-3 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/90717
Title
CT of appendicoliths in adult appendicitis: clinical significance and characteristics of overlooked cases
Author's Affiliation
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Objectives: Accurate computed tomography (CT) identification of appendicoliths in adults with acute appendicitis is crucial as it may preclude nonoperative management due to high risk of failure and complications. This investigation aimed to identify the significance of appendicoliths in acute appendicitis and to evaluate the performance of portovenous-phase (PVP) CT and the consequences of overlooked appendicoliths. Methods: CT examinations of 324 consecutive patients (mean age 51.9 years, 112 men) with pathologically confirmed acute appendicitis were retrospectively included. Two radiologists independently reviewed the images, and disagreement was resolved by a consensus. Results: Appendicoliths were identified in 134/324 patients, of which 75 had complicated appendicitis. Among 190 patients without appendicoliths, 52 had complicated appendicitis. An appendicolith was independently associated with complicated appendicitis (adjusted odds ratio 2.289; 95% CI: 1.343–3.902; p = 0.002). The larger minimum diameter was significantly associated with complication. The 4.5-/6.0-mm cutoffs for minimum and maximum diameters of appendicoliths demonstrated 82.7%/85.3% sensitivity and 35.6%/33.9% specificity in predicting complications. The PVP alone had 82.1–88.1% sensitivity, respectively per patient and per appendicolith, and a 100% specificity in the detection of appendicoliths, as compared with combined noncontrast and PVP. PVP overlooked 28/237 appendicoliths (11.8%) corresponding to 24/134 patients (17.9%). Of the 24 patients with overlooked appendicoliths, 16 had complicated appendicitis but 14 were correctly categorized by findings other than appendicoliths. In total, 2/127 patients (1.6%) with complicated appendicitis were misdiagnosed as having uncomplicated appendicitis. Conclusions: Appendicoliths in acute appendicitis were strongly associated with complications. While PVP overlooked some appendicoliths, only 1.6% of complicated appendicitis were misclassified when considering other CT findings. Clinical relevance statement: This study found a strong association between appendicoliths and complications. Its presence may preclude conservative management. Although portovenous-phase CT overlooked some appendicoliths, the combination with other CT findings allowed correct classification in a vast majority of cases. Key Points: • Accurate identification of appendicoliths is crucial for nonoperative management decisions in adult acute appendicitis. • Appendicoliths are strongly associated with complications in adult acute appendicitis. • Portovenous-phase CT overlooked some appendicoliths, but only a small percentage of patients with complicated appendicitis were misclassified when considering other CT findings.