Control and complications of diabetes in urban primary care units in Thailand: a cross-sectional study
3
Issued Date
2022-12-01
Resource Type
eISSN
27314553
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85136167173
Pubmed ID
35996081
Journal Title
BMC Primary Care
Volume
23
Issue
1
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
BMC Primary Care Vol.23 No.1 (2022)
Suggested Citation
Puangpet T., Pongkunakorn T., Chulkarat N., Bunlangjit C., Surawit A., Pinsawas B., Mongkolsucharitkul P., Mayurasakorn K. Control and complications of diabetes in urban primary care units in Thailand: a cross-sectional study. BMC Primary Care Vol.23 No.1 (2022). doi:10.1186/s12875-022-01823-7 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/87180
Title
Control and complications of diabetes in urban primary care units in Thailand: a cross-sectional study
Author's Affiliation
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: Primary health care system plays a central role in caring for persons with diabetes. Thai National Health Examination Survey (NHES) reports that only 40% of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) achieve optimal glycemic control. We sought to evaluate the quality of diabetic care (QOC), prevalence of microvascular complications, and associated risk factors among T2DM patients treated at primary care units in urban areas in Thailand. Methods: A population-based, cross-sectional study of 488 T2DM patients aged over 35 years from 25 primary care units in Samutsakhon, Thailand was conducted during February 2018 to March 2019. Clinical targets of care (TOC) and processes of care (POC) were measured to evaluate QOC. Multivariate logistic regression models were applied to explore the association between risk factors and glycemic control. Results: 41.2% of women and 44.4% of men achieved hemoglobin A1C (A1C) < 53 mmol/mol, while 31.3% of women and 29.7% of men had poor glycemic control (A1C > 63 mmol/mol). 39 participants (8%) achieved all TOC and 318 participants (65.2%) achieved all POC. Significant risk factors for poor glycemic control included diabetes duration > 6 years (AOR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.20–2.79), being overweight (AOR = 2.54, 95% CI = 1.58–4.08), obesity (AOR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.05–2.89), triglycerides > 1.7 mmol/l (AOR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.25–2.78), low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥ 2.6 mmol/l (AOR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.04–2.28). On the other hand, participants aged > 65 years (AOR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.14–0.55) or achieved TOC indicators (AOR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.43–0.89) were significantly associated with glycemic control. Diabetic retinopathy was significantly related to obesity (AOR = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.00–4.86), over waist circumference (AOR = 2.23, 95% CI = 0.77–2.31), and diastolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg (AOR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.48–1.96). Conclusion: Access to essential diabetic screening in primary care units is crucial to determine status of disease control and guide disease management. Duration of T2DM, high body mass index, triglyceride and LDL-C were independently associated with poor glycemic control. Obesity was highly associated with diabetes retinopathy. Effort should be taken seriously toward monitoring these factors and providing effective care.