Effects of nasoalveolar molding on nasolabial aesthetics in patients with cleft lip and palate during pre-adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective studies

dc.contributor.authorLikitkulthanaporn A.
dc.contributor.authorBoonpratham S.
dc.contributor.authorHonglertnapakul Y.
dc.contributor.authorSaengfai N.N.
dc.contributor.authorChaweewannakorn C.
dc.contributor.authorJongkhum N.
dc.contributor.authorPeanchitlertkajorn S.
dc.contributor.correspondenceLikitkulthanaporn A.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-13T18:06:48Z
dc.date.available2024-02-13T18:06:48Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to analyze long-term effects of nasoalveolar molding (NAM) as a part of cleft primary management protocols on nasolabial aesthetics for patients with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. Six electronic databases and two journals were searched up to July 2023. Studies comparing nasolabial outcomes between NAM and non-NAM protocols were selected for further analysis. Nasolabial aesthetics were the outcome of interest. Data extraction, methodological quality assessment, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were performed. Seven retrospective cohort studies were selected for a qualitative review and four for a quantitative analysis. The risk of bias assessment was moderate for most studies. Only studies utilizing the Asher-McDade rating (AMR) were included for meta-analyses. The protocols with NAM exhibited a significantly lower AMR score for vermillion border than other protocols. AMR scores for nasal form and nasal symmetry from protocols with NAM were significantly lower than protocols without any pre-surgical infant orthopaedics (PSIO) but not significantly different from protocols with other PSIO techniques. The AMR score for nasolabial profile from protocols with NAM was not significantly different from other protocols. However, subgroup analysis demonstrated that protocol combining NAM and primary rhinoplasty significantly lowered AMR scores for nasal form, nasal symmetry and nasolabial profile. For patients with unilateral cleft lip with or without palate (UCLP), this study found that a protocol combining NAM and primary rhinoplasty improved nasolabial outcomes while a protocol with NAM alone offered only limited benefits. For patients with BCLP, the available evidence remains inconclusive. Performing NAM in combination with primary rhinoplasty improves nasolabial aesthetics in patients with UCLP. PROSPERO (CRD4202128384).
dc.identifier.citationOrthodontics and Craniofacial Research (2024)
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ocr.12762
dc.identifier.eissn16016343
dc.identifier.issn16016335
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85183900792
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/97116
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectDentistry
dc.titleEffects of nasoalveolar molding on nasolabial aesthetics in patients with cleft lip and palate during pre-adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective studies
dc.typeReview
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85183900792&origin=inward
oaire.citation.titleOrthodontics and Craniofacial Research
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol University, Faculty of Dentistry
oairecerif.author.affiliationChonburi Regional Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationSomdech Phra Nangchao Sirikit Hospital

Files

Collections