The Significance of the Phitsanulok Dhammakāya Inscription for the Dating and Character of Boran (Ancient) Practices in Southeast Asian Theravāda Buddhism
Issued Date
2022-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
02652897
eISSN
17479681
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85139294222
Journal Title
Buddhist Studies Review
Volume
39
Issue
1
Start Page
11
End Page
47
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Buddhist Studies Review Vol.39 No.1 (2022) , 11-47
Suggested Citation
Choompolpaisal P., Skilton A. The Significance of the Phitsanulok Dhammakāya Inscription for the Dating and Character of Boran (Ancient) Practices in Southeast Asian Theravāda Buddhism. Buddhist Studies Review Vol.39 No.1 (2022) , 11-47. 47. doi:10.1558/BSRV.20824 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/83464
Title
The Significance of the Phitsanulok Dhammakāya Inscription for the Dating and Character of Boran (Ancient) Practices in Southeast Asian Theravāda Buddhism
Author(s)
Author's Affiliation
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
This article examines the Phitsanulok Dhammakāya inscription of 1549 and other sources for the anonymous post-canonical recitation text called Dhammakāya. It discusses the significance of their paratextual framing and the conclusions that can be drawn from it. An annotated transcription and translation of the text is provided. We argue that the inscription provides the earliest objectively verifiable date for the traditional or non-reform type of Theravāda practices elsewhere called boran (ancient) practices. These practices include a specific pre-modern form of boran kammatthan (ancient meditation), Buddha image consecration and/or recitation. The article examines in some detail the context of the patronage and installation of the inscription, and includes a review of the historical evidence for this period, showing unambiguously that this form of Theravāda received royal patronage in Siam during the Ayutthaya period in the sixteenth century. This is consistent with recent findings that establish its continued royal patronage in Ayutthaya and then Kandy two centuries later. The article is split into four sections: 1. the boran kammatthan context; 2. the Dhammakāya text; 3. the historical context for the inscription; 4. conclusions regarding its significance.