Triage processes in primary, secondary, and tertiary health care facilities in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal: a mixed-methods study
Issued Date
2024-12-01
Resource Type
eISSN
1471227X
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85210173875
Journal Title
BMC Emergency Medicine
Volume
24
Issue
1
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
BMC Emergency Medicine Vol.24 No.1 (2024)
Suggested Citation
Shrestha L., Adhikari B., Bajracharya M., Aryal N., Rajbhandari A., Shrestha S., Pariyar R., Maharjan R.K., Otieno M., Watson M., Sapkota J., Dittrich S., Tetteh K.K.A., Das D. Triage processes in primary, secondary, and tertiary health care facilities in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal: a mixed-methods study. BMC Emergency Medicine Vol.24 No.1 (2024). doi:10.1186/s12873-024-01139-y Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/102247
Title
Triage processes in primary, secondary, and tertiary health care facilities in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal: a mixed-methods study
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: In healthcare facilities, an efficient triage system is critical to optimize patient care. The main objective of this study was to explore the triage processes and practices in three different tiers of healthcare facilities in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Methods: A mixed-methods approach in this study comprised observations and interviews in ten healthcare settings across primary care centers (PHC; n = 6), secondary care centers (SHC; n = 3), and tertiary care hospital (n = 1). Data were collected from June to November 2023. Semi-structured interviews were conducted among patients (n = 30) including survey questionnaires among 144 healthcare workers (HCWs) focused on triage. The qualitative data were analyzed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis and quantitative data were analyzed to explore the median score on the consistent practice of triage based on the Likert scale. Results: PHCs had designated space for triage with less equipped emergency services and outpatient departments (OPDs) and received severely ill patients rarely. Although prioritizing critical patients and prompt care was part of the services, there was a lack of triage protocols with more than half of the HCWs (56.3%; 36/64) from the tertiary hospital reporting the availability of triage guidelines compared to SHCs (28.1%; 9/32) and PHCs (6.3%; 3/48). The majority of HCWs from the tertiary level recognized triage's effectiveness in reducing time lag, and prioritizing patients. Tertiary level had the consistent use of triage (94%; 60/64) compared to only around two-thirds in SHCs (66%; 19/29) and PHCs (62%; 28/45). Patients often attended PHC services for routine check-ups and were motivated by health insurance, affordability, free medicines, referral cards, and proximity. In the SHC, there was a well-equipped emergency department (ED) with specific guidelines, but its use was infrequent. Patients were unaware of the triage process and its utility. In all settings, while most HCWs had a basic knowledge of triage, some were not confident due to limited exposure to the triage process and training. Many HCWs reported the need for triage-related training and its’ consistent implementation. Conclusions: Consistent utilization of triage protocols, coupled with improved infrastructure, resource allocation, and training for healthcare workers is critical for the optimization of triage processes in healthcare settings in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal.