Closed-Loop ventilation using sidestream versus mainstream capnography for automated adjustments of minute ventilation-A randomized clinical trial in cardiac surgery patients

dc.contributor.authorNijbroek S.G.L.H.
dc.contributor.authorRoozeman J.P.
dc.contributor.authorEttayeby S.
dc.contributor.authorRosenberg N.M.
dc.contributor.authorvan Meenen D.M.P.
dc.contributor.authorCherpanath T.G.V.
dc.contributor.authorLagrand W.K.
dc.contributor.authorTepaske R.
dc.contributor.authorKlautz R.J.M.
dc.contributor.authorNeto A.S.
dc.contributor.authorSchultz M.J.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-02T18:02:18Z
dc.date.available2023-09-02T18:02:18Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: INTELLiVENT-Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV) is a closed-loop ventilation mode that uses capnography to adjust tidal volume (VT) and respiratory rate according to a user-set end-tidal CO2 (etCO2) target range. We compared sidestream versus mainstream capnography with this ventilation mode with respect to the quality of breathing in patients after cardiac surgery. METHODS: Single-center, single-blinded, non-inferiority, randomized clinical trial in adult patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery that were expected to receive at least two hours of postoperative ventilation in the ICU. Patients were randomized 1:1 to closed-loop ventilation with sidestream or mainstream capnography. Each breath was classified into a zone based on the measured VT, maximum airway pressure, etCO2 and pulse oximetry. The primary outcome was the proportion of breaths spent in a predefined 'optimal' zone of ventilation during the first three hours of postoperative ventilation, with a non-inferiority margin for the difference in the proportions set at -20%. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of breaths in predefined 'acceptable' and 'critical' zones of ventilation, and the proportion of breaths with hypoxemia. RESULTS: Of 80 randomized subjects, 78 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. We could not confirm the non-inferiority of closed-loop ventilation using sidestream with respect to the proportion of breaths in the 'optimal' zone (mean ratio 0.87 [0.77 to ∞]; P = 0.116 for non-inferiority). The proportion of breaths with hypoxemia was higher in the sidestream capnography group versus the mainstream capnography group. CONCLUSIONS: We could not confirm that INTELLiVENT-ASV using sidestream capnography is non-inferior to INTELLiVENT-ASV using mainstream capnography with respect to the quality of breathing in subjects receiving postoperative ventilation after cardiac surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04599491 (clinicaltrials.gov).
dc.identifier.citationPloS one Vol.18 No.8 (2023) , e0289412
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0289412
dc.identifier.eissn19326203
dc.identifier.pmid37611007
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85168564413
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/89149
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMultidisciplinary
dc.titleClosed-Loop ventilation using sidestream versus mainstream capnography for automated adjustments of minute ventilation-A randomized clinical trial in cardiac surgery patients
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85168564413&origin=inward
oaire.citation.issue8
oaire.citation.titlePloS one
oaire.citation.volume18
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit
oairecerif.author.affiliationMelbourne Medical School
oairecerif.author.affiliationHospital Israelita Albert Einstein
oairecerif.author.affiliationLeids Universitair Medisch Centrum
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences
oairecerif.author.affiliationSpaarne Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationNuffield Department of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationAmsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam

Files

Collections