Perioperative Enfortumab Vedotin and Pembrolizumab in Bladder Cancer

dc.contributor.authorVulsteke C.
dc.contributor.authorAdra N.
dc.contributor.authorDanchaivijitr P.
dc.contributor.authorSabadash M.
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez-Vida A.
dc.contributor.authorZhang Z.
dc.contributor.authorAtduev V.
dc.contributor.authorGöger Y.E.
dc.contributor.authorRausch S.
dc.contributor.authorKang S.H.
dc.contributor.authorLoriot Y.
dc.contributor.authorBedke J.
dc.contributor.authorGalsky M.D.
dc.contributor.authorO'Donnell P.H.
dc.contributor.authorvon Amsberg G.
dc.contributor.authorAlimohamed N.
dc.contributor.authorSulimka G.
dc.contributor.authorGupta S.
dc.contributor.authorParamonov V.
dc.contributor.authorNakane K.
dc.contributor.authorMihm M.
dc.contributor.authorMeng C.
dc.contributor.authorHuang C.D.
dc.contributor.authorRamamurthy C.
dc.contributor.authorHomet Moreno B.
dc.contributor.authorUllén A.
dc.contributor.correspondenceVulsteke C.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-13T18:09:06Z
dc.date.available2026-04-13T18:09:06Z
dc.date.issued2026-04-02
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who are ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy proceed directly to radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph-node dissection. Perioperative therapy may improve outcomes in this population. METHODS: In this phase 3, open-label trial, participants with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who were ineligible for or declined cisplatin-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned to perioperative (neoadjuvant and adjuvant) enfortumab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugate directed at nectin-4, plus pembrolizumab and surgery (9 total cycles of enfortumab vedotin [1.25 mg per kilogram of body weight on days 1 and 8] plus 17 total cycles of pembrolizumab [200 mg on day 1 every 3 weeks], with surgery after 3 cycles) or surgery alone (control). The primary end point was event-free survival. Key secondary end points were overall survival and pathological complete response (absence of viable tumor after surgical resection). Other secondary end points included safety. RESULTS: A total of 344 participants underwent randomization (170 in the enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab group and 174 in the control group). At data cutoff, median follow-up was 25.6 months (range, 11.8 to 53.7). Surgery was performed in 87.6% of participants in the enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab group and in 89.7% in the control group. At 2 years, estimated event-free survival was 74.7% in the enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab group and 39.4% in the control group (hazard ratio for an event or death, 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28 to 0.57; two-sided P<0.001); estimated overall survival was 79.7% and 63.1% (hazard ratio for death, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.74; two-sided P<0.001). A pathological complete response had occurred in 57.1% and 8.6% of the participants (estimated difference, 48.3 percentage points; 95% CI, 39.5 to 56.5; two-sided P<0.001). Adverse events occurred in all participants in the enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab group (grade ≥3, 71.3%; grade ≥3 drug-related, 45.5%) and in 64.8% in the control group (grade ≥3, 45.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab and surgery led to significantly better event-free and overall survival outcomes and a greater percentage of participants with pathological complete response than surgery alone in a predominantly cisplatin-ineligible population with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Safety was also assessed. (Funded by Merck Sharp and Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck [Rahway, NJ]; KEYNOTE-905 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03924895.).
dc.identifier.citationNew England Journal of Medicine Vol.394 No.13 (2026) , 1257-1269
dc.identifier.doi10.1056/NEJMoa2511674
dc.identifier.eissn15334406
dc.identifier.pmid41707170
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105035017291
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/116160
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titlePerioperative Enfortumab Vedotin and Pembrolizumab in Bladder Cancer
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105035017291&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage1269
oaire.citation.issue13
oaire.citation.startPage1257
oaire.citation.titleNew England Journal of Medicine
oaire.citation.volume394
oairecerif.author.affiliationThe University of Chicago
oairecerif.author.affiliationKarolinska Institutet
oairecerif.author.affiliationIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
oairecerif.author.affiliationKarolinska Universitetssjukhuset
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversiteit Antwerpen
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
oairecerif.author.affiliationPfizer Inc.
oairecerif.author.affiliationMerck & Co., Inc.
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinikum und Medizinische Fakultät Tübingen
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut de Cancerologie Gustave Roussy
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationNecmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi
oairecerif.author.affiliationKorea University Anam Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationTaussig Cancer Center
oairecerif.author.affiliationGraduate School of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationIndiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center
oairecerif.author.affiliationKlinikum Stuttgart
oairecerif.author.affiliationAstellas Pharma US, Inc.
oairecerif.author.affiliationAZ Maria Middelares
oairecerif.author.affiliationLviv State Oncological Regional Treatment and Diagnostic Center
oairecerif.author.affiliationArthur J.E. Child Comprehensive Cancer Centre
oairecerif.author.affiliationHospital del Mar
oairecerif.author.affiliationFederal Medical and Biological Agency
oairecerif.author.affiliationHematology

Files

Collections