Thermal imaging for assessment of maize water stress and yield prediction under drought conditions

dc.contributor.authorPradawet C.
dc.contributor.authorKhongdee N.
dc.contributor.authorPansak W.
dc.contributor.authorSpreer W.
dc.contributor.authorHilger T.
dc.contributor.authorCadisch G.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-16T10:41:30Z
dc.date.available2023-05-16T10:41:30Z
dc.date.issued2023-02-01
dc.description.abstractMaize production in Thailand is increasingly suffering from drought periods along the cropping season. This creates the need for rapid and accurate methods to detect crop water stress to prevent yield loss. The study was, therefore, conducted to improve the efficacy of thermal imaging for assessing maize water stress and yield prediction. The experiment was carried out under controlled and field conditions in Phitsanulok, Thailand. Five treatments were applied, including (T1) fully irrigated treatment with 100% of crop water requirement (CWR) as control; (T2) early stress with 50% of CWR from 20 days after sowing (DAS) until anthesis and subsequent rewatering; (T3) sustained deficit at 50% of CWR from 20 DAS until harvest; (T4) late stress with 100% of CWR until anthesis and 50% of CWR after anthesis until harvest; (T5) late stress with 100% of CWR until anthesis and no irrigation after anthesis. Canopy temperature (FLIR), crop growth and soil moisture were measured at 5-day-intervals. Under controlled conditions, early water stress significantly reduced maize growth and yield. Water deficit after anthesis had no significant effect. A new combination of wet/dry sponge type reference surfaces was used for the determination of the Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI). There was a strong relationship between CWSI and stomatal conductance (R² = 0.90), with a CWSI of 0.35 being correlated to a 64%-yield loss. Assessing CWSI at 55 DAS, that is, at tasseling, under greenhouse conditions corresponded best to the final maize yield. This linear regression model validated well in both maize lowland (R² = 0.94) and maize upland fields (R² = 0.97) under the prevailing variety, soil and climate conditions. The results demonstrate that, using improved standardized references and data acquisition protocols, thermal imaging CWSI monitoring according to critical phenological stages enables yield prediction under drought stress.
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Agronomy and Crop Science Vol.209 No.1 (2023) , 56-70
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jac.12582
dc.identifier.eissn1439037X
dc.identifier.issn09312250
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85124573929
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/81465
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciences
dc.titleThermal imaging for assessment of maize water stress and yield prediction under drought conditions
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85124573929&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage70
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.startPage56
oaire.citation.titleJournal of Agronomy and Crop Science
oaire.citation.volume209
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Environment and Resource Studies, Mahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationNaresuan University
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversität Hohenheim
oairecerif.author.affiliationMaejo University

Files

Collections