Dark-blood late gadolinium-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for myocardial scar detection based on simplified timing scheme: single-center experience in patients with suspected coronary artery disease
Issued Date
2022-02-01
Resource Type
ISSN
22234292
eISSN
22234306
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85121107938
Journal Title
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Volume
12
Issue
2
Start Page
1037
End Page
1050
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Vol.12 No.2 (2022) , 1037-1050
Suggested Citation
Krittayaphong R. Dark-blood late gadolinium-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for myocardial scar detection based on simplified timing scheme: single-center experience in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Vol.12 No.2 (2022) , 1037-1050. 1050. doi:10.21037/qims-21-704 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/87383
Title
Dark-blood late gadolinium-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for myocardial scar detection based on simplified timing scheme: single-center experience in patients with suspected coronary artery disease
Author(s)
Author's Affiliation
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: This study aims to examine scar detectability using dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) with simplified timing scheme and fixed parameters comparing to two conventional bright-blood approaches in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Methods: Three LGE techniques were performed in all patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease at 3 T: dark blood two-dimensional (2D) phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) preceded with a T2-preparation pulse (DB-LGE), conventional three-dimensional (3D) gradient-echo inversion recovery (3D-IR) and conventional 2D PSIR. Timing parameters in DB-LGE were tested in five clinically confirmed coronary artery disease patients with scars and fixed for the rest of the study. Two independent readers evaluated images at both patient and segment levels. Image quality and contrast ratio between scar and adjacent tissues were assessed. Concordance between the three techniques and detection rate based on expert consensus were reported. Results: Forty-six patients were recruited in the study (average age 66.8 years, 69.6% male). DB-LGE demonstrated superior image quality (P=0.001 vs. 3D-IR) and scar-to-blood contrast ratio (P<0.001 vs. 3D-IR and PSIR). Among 41 patients with suspected coronary artery disease, myocardial scar was present in 30 patients (73.2%), all detected by DB-LGE, yielding a detection rate of 100% compared to 93.3% and 96.7% for bright-blood 3D-IR and PSIR. For subendocardial scar detection among 656 segments, DB-LGE had a detection rate of 99.4% compared to 57.8% for 3D-IR and 61.0% for PSIR (both P<0.001). Conclusions: DB-LGE improves detection of myocardial scar compared with conventional bright-blood LGE techniques, particularly of subendocardial scar.