Pin-Based Fractional Radiofrequency: 2024 International Consensus Recommendations for Aesthetic Skin Indications

dc.contributor.authorWaldorf H.A.
dc.contributor.authorVictor Ross E.
dc.contributor.authorAdatto M.
dc.contributor.authorArtzi O.
dc.contributor.authorEubanks S.W.
dc.contributor.authorKaye K.O.
dc.contributor.authorManuskiatti W.
dc.contributor.authorSadick N.
dc.contributor.authorSattler S.
dc.contributor.authorSuwanchinda A.
dc.contributor.correspondenceWaldorf H.A.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-25T18:30:10Z
dc.date.available2025-08-25T18:30:10Z
dc.date.issued2025-08-01
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objective: Fractional radiofrequency was developed as a potentially lower-risk and downtime alternative to traditional fractional ablative and nonablative lasers for skin resurfacing. Pin-based FRF (pFRF) delivers radiofrequency heat in focal, high-energy density columns within intact skin, without microneedle insertion. The main objective of this publication was to get an expert consensus on best-in-practice protocols for treating common aesthetic indications for resurfacing using a novel pFRF device. Methods: An international panel of 10 dermatologists and plastic and reconstructive surgeons from 6 countries and a variety of practice settings was assembled to develop updated consensus recommendations for using pFRF. A modified Delphi method included: a preliminary questionnaire, video conference roundtable discussion, individual review of initial data, a secondary questionnaire, and multiple rounds of email discussion until a group consensus was reached. Results: The panel developed standardized pFRF protocols for the treatment of acne scars, enlarged pores, skin texture, rhytides, and striae. For each diagnosis, device parameters and techniques are outlined. General requirements for patient preparation, anesthesia, and post-treatment care are described. Special consideration was given to device settings for condition severity and Fitzpatrick skin type. These guidelines are meant to provide new practitioners with a starting point for safe and effective patient treatment. Conclusions: pFRF without microneedles is a useful alternative to fractional laser technology and radiofrequency microneedling for resurfacing patients’ skin texture irregularities. Patients tolerate the procedure and recovery well. Here, protocols for the treatment of 5 common aesthetic skin complaints with a novel pFRF device are provided.
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Drugs in Dermatology Vol.24 No.8 (2025) , 817-824
dc.identifier.doi10.36849/JDD.8669R1
dc.identifier.issn15459616
dc.identifier.pmid40773612
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105013324069
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/111821
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titlePin-Based Fractional Radiofrequency: 2024 International Consensus Recommendations for Aesthetic Skin Indications
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105013324069&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage824
oaire.citation.issue8
oaire.citation.startPage817
oaire.citation.titleJournal of Drugs in Dermatology
oaire.citation.volume24
oairecerif.author.affiliationWeill Cornell Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationTel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
oairecerif.author.affiliationThammasat University
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationRamathibodi Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationScripps Clinic
oairecerif.author.affiliationRosenparkklinik
oairecerif.author.affiliationOcean Clinic
oairecerif.author.affiliationSkinpulse Dermatology and Laser Centre
oairecerif.author.affiliationLeavitt Medical Associates of Florida

Files

Collections