In Vitro Comparison of the Mechanical and Optical Characteristics of the Storz Flex-XC1 Single-use Ureteroscope and the Storz Flex-XC Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope
| dc.contributor.author | Leelathanyakit C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chotikawanich E. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Taweemonkongsap T. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Phinthusophon K. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jitpraphai S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ramart P. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Woranisarakul V. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mankongsrisuk T. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hansomwong T. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jongjitaree K. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Srinualnad S. | |
| dc.contributor.correspondence | Leelathanyakit C. | |
| dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-12T18:05:57Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-06-12T18:05:57Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-01-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective: This study compared the mechanical and optical characteristics of the Storz Flex-X<sup>C1</sup> single-use ureteroscope and the Storz Flex-X<sup>C</sup> reusable flexible ureteroscope. The mechanical parameters comprised the upward/downward deflection, loop diameter, and irrigation flow rate. The optical parameters were image resolution and color representation. Materials and Methods: We conducted an in vitro evaluation of two Karl Storz flexible ureteroscopes. Specifically, we examined the Storz Flex-X<sup>C1</sup> single-use and Storz Flex-X<sup>C</sup> reusable scopes for upward/downward deflection angles, loop diameter, irrigation flow rates, image resolution, and color representation. The Storz Professional Image Enhancement System was also applied. Results: The Storz Flex-X<sup>C</sup> reusable ureteroscope achieved greater upward/downward deflection angles than did the Storz Flex-X<sup>C1</sup> single-use ureteroscope when a 200 µm laser or a 1.9 Fr tipless basket was used, with mean differences of 1.9°‒2.2° and 2.3°‒5.6°, respectively. No clinically significant difference in loop diameter was found. The Storz Flex reusable scope achieved a higher irrigation flow rate with an empty working channel (mean difference of 2.25 ml/min). Both scopes demonstrated identical image resolutions in air and in a normal saline solution, but the Storz Flex single-use device showed superior color representation. Conclusion: The Storz Flex-X<sup>C</sup> reusable flexible ureteroscope displayed slight advantages in terms of the deflection angle and irrigation flow rate. The Storz Flex-X<sup>C1</sup> single-use flexible ureteroscope offered improved color representation and marginally better resolution in saline. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Siriraj Medical Journal Vol.77 No.5 (2025) , 313-321 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.33192/smj.v77i5.272982 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 22288082 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105007363746 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/110623 | |
| dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | |
| dc.subject | Medicine | |
| dc.title | In Vitro Comparison of the Mechanical and Optical Characteristics of the Storz Flex-XC1 Single-use Ureteroscope and the Storz Flex-XC Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105007363746&origin=inward | |
| oaire.citation.endPage | 321 | |
| oaire.citation.issue | 5 | |
| oaire.citation.startPage | 313 | |
| oaire.citation.title | Siriraj Medical Journal | |
| oaire.citation.volume | 77 | |
| oairecerif.author.affiliation | Siriraj Hospital |
