Appropriate compression values for the transtibial prosthesis using the AERO prosthetic liner
| dc.contributor.author | Miyata Y. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Nutchamlong Y. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Guerra G. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sasaki K. | |
| dc.contributor.correspondence | Miyata Y. | |
| dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-24T18:09:46Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-04-24T18:09:46Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-01-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Positive model rectification is a key factor in providing a comfortable and successful transtibial prosthetic socket fitting. This study aimed to assess whether a 4% compression value in 3- and 5-mm thickness affordable ethylene-vinyl acetate roll-on (AERO) liners yields acceptable comfort and pressure distribution for transtibial prosthetic users. Stump socks were used to adjust volume in the fitting process with a socket compressed to 4%, and pressure data were collected using 6 force-sensing resistor (FSR400) sensors placed in areas sensitive and tolerant to pressure. Peak pressure was collected from 40 steps, and pressure uniformity was calculated using the coefficient of variation in 2-min walking on the treadmill. The socket comfort score was collected after the trial. Appropriate compression values, pressure distribution, and socket comfort score were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and effect size was determined using Cliff’s delta. The study found that a 4.95% compression was optimal for a 3-mm thickness liner, whereas a 4.5% compression suited a 5-mm liner better for comfort. Moreover, the study observed a small similarity in pressure distribution between liners, as indicated by Cliff’s delta, with the 5-mm liner possibly providing more even pressure because of its thickness. Despite being made of the same material, liners with different thicknesses distribute pressure differently. Therefore, this study suggests that a 4% universal compression value in the affordable ethylene-vinyl acetate roll-on liner may be effective for use in a clinical setting. Future studies should include more participants to identify the appropriate compression for a variety of residual limbs. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Prosthetics and Orthotics International (2025) | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000446 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 17461553 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 03093646 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105002775427 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/109754 | |
| dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | |
| dc.subject | Medicine | |
| dc.subject | Health Professions | |
| dc.title | Appropriate compression values for the transtibial prosthesis using the AERO prosthetic liner | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105002775427&origin=inward | |
| oaire.citation.title | Prosthetics and Orthotics International | |
| oairecerif.author.affiliation | Siriraj Hospital | |
| oairecerif.author.affiliation | St. Mary's University San Antonio |
