The AERO prosthetic liner: socket pressure distribution, comfort and material composition
Issued Date
2024-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
07853890
eISSN
13652060
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85199800374
Pubmed ID
39061117
Journal Title
Annals of Medicine
Volume
56
Issue
1
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Annals of Medicine Vol.56 No.1 (2024)
Suggested Citation
Miyata Y., Sasaki K., Guerra G., Dacharux W., Chaisumritchoke S. The AERO prosthetic liner: socket pressure distribution, comfort and material composition. Annals of Medicine Vol.56 No.1 (2024). doi:10.1080/07853890.2024.2380798 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/100215
Title
The AERO prosthetic liner: socket pressure distribution, comfort and material composition
Author(s)
Author's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the pressure distribution and comfort of transtibial prosthesis wearers using an affordable ethyl-vinyl acetate (EVA) roll-on (AERO) liner. Method: Fifteen unilateral transtibial prosthesis users wore patella tendon bearing (PTB) sockets with a polyethylene foam (PE-lite) liner were enrolled this study. AERO liners were provided to all participants. Six force sensors were applied to the residual limb to evaluate pressure distribution during treadmill walking, and the socket comfort score (SCS) was used to evaluate comfortability. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy was performed on the EVA and PE-lite liners. Results: Eleven participants used prefabricated AERO liners and four participants used custom-made AERO liners. The pressure distribution was analysed by the coefficient of variation (CV): PE-lite was 75.7 ± 6.0 and AERO liner 83.3 ± 4.1. Residual limb pressure was significantly decreased when using the AERO liner (p =.0007), with a large effect size (r = 0.87). Mean SCS was 7.5 ± 1.3 and 8.9 ± 1.1 for PE-lite and AERO liner respectively. Conclusion: Better pressure distribution and comfort were observed when the participants used the AERO liner. AERO had a greater proportion of calcium carbonate (CaCO3). These findings suggest that the AERO liner is a better off-the-shelf option for persons using traditional prosthetic sockets and liners.