Comparison of Arterial Puncture Skill Improvement Between Training with an Arterial Puncture Part-Task Trainer Simulator and Conventional Training in Fifth-Year Medical Students: A Pilot Study

dc.contributor.authorAthinartrattanapong N.
dc.contributor.authorChamchoi P.
dc.contributor.authorChalermdamrichai P.
dc.contributor.authorTangkulpanich P.
dc.contributor.authorYuksen C.
dc.contributor.authorPalee C.
dc.contributor.authorSeesuklom S.
dc.contributor.correspondenceAthinartrattanapong N.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-29T18:16:18Z
dc.date.available2026-04-29T18:16:18Z
dc.date.issued2026-01-01
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Arterial puncture is a fundamental procedural skill that medical trainees must acquire. However, it carries a risk of serious complications, particularly when performed by inexperienced operators. This study aimed to develop an arterial puncture part-task trainer to enhance skill acquisition among medical students and to compare arterial puncture performance between simulator-based training and conventional training in fifth-year medical students. Methods: This experimental study was conducted from January 26, 2024, to April 11, 2024, and included twenty-two fifth-year medical students undergoing emergency department training at Ramathibodi Hospital. Participants performed arterial punctures on patients, and all procedures were recorded on video. Three independent raters evaluated the recordings using a standardized procedural checklist. The primary outcome was the total arterial puncture procedural checklist score during the initial patient-based assessment. The intervention group additionally underwent a reassessment two weeks after simulator training to evaluate skill retention. Continuous variables were analyzed using Student’s t-test, while categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: During the study period, the intervention group (n=10) achieved a significantly higher total skill score (37.1 ± 3.2) compared to the control group (n=12), which had a score of 33.25 ± 3.8 (p = 0.016). Additionally, the total self-confidence scores significantly increased from 23.5 to 25.6 (p = 0.040). Participants expressed strong satisfaction with the arterial puncture part-task trainer, with a mean rating of 3.68 for its suitability for practicing arterial puncture and a mean rating of 3.86 for its potential use in medical student training. Conclusion: Although this pilot study involved a relatively small sample size, the arterial puncture part-task trainer simulator significantly improved both procedural skill performance and self-confidence in performing arterial punctures.
dc.identifier.citationAdvances in Medical Education and Practice Vol.17 (2026)
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/AMEP.S530106
dc.identifier.eissn11797258
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105035883675
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/116375
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectSocial Sciences
dc.titleComparison of Arterial Puncture Skill Improvement Between Training with an Arterial Puncture Part-Task Trainer Simulator and Conventional Training in Fifth-Year Medical Students: A Pilot Study
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105035883675&origin=inward
oaire.citation.titleAdvances in Medical Education and Practice
oaire.citation.volume17
oairecerif.author.affiliationRamathibodi Hospital

Files

Collections