Ratio of Oxygen Saturation to Inspired Oxygen, ROX Index, Modified ROX Index to Predict High Flow Cannula Success in COVID-19 Patients: Multicenter Validation Study

dc.contributor.authorRuangsomboon O.
dc.contributor.authorJirathanavichai S.
dc.contributor.authorPhanprasert N.
dc.contributor.authorPuchongmart C.
dc.contributor.authorBoonmee P.
dc.contributor.authorThirawattanasoot N.
dc.contributor.authorDorongthom T.
dc.contributor.authorMonsomboon A.
dc.contributor.authorPraphruetkit N.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-03T17:49:20Z
dc.date.available2023-07-03T17:49:20Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a respiratory support measure for coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) patients that has been increasingly used in the emergency department (ED). Although the respiratory rate oxygenation (ROX) index can predict HFNC success, its utility in emergency COVID-19 patients has not been well-established. Also, no studies have compared it to its simpler component, the oxygen saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen (SpO2/FiO2 [SF]) ratio, or its modified version incorporating heart rate. Therefore, we aimed to compare the utility of the SF ratio, the ROX index (SF ratio/respiratory rate), and the modified ROX index (ROX index/heart rate) in predicting HFNC success in emergency COVID-19 patients. Methods: We conducted this multicenter retrospective study at five EDs in Thailand between January–December 2021. Adult patients with COVID-19 treated with HFNC in the ED were included. The three study parameters were recorded at 0 and 2 hours. The primary outcome was HFNC success, defined as no requirement of mechanical ventilation at HFNC termination. Results: A total of 173 patients were recruited; 55 (31.8%) had successful treatment. The two-hour SF ratio yielded the highest discrimination capacity (AUROC 0.651, 95% CI 0.558-0.744), followed by two-hour ROX and modified ROX indices (AUROC 0.612 and 0.606, respectively). The two-hour SF ratio also had the best calibration and overall model performance. At its optimal cut-point of 128.19, it gave a balanced sensitivity (65.3%) and specificity (61.8%). The two-hour SF≥128.19 was also significantly and independently associated with HFNC failure (adjusted odds ratio 0.29, 95% CI 0.13-0.65; P=0.003). Conclusion: The SF ratio predicted HFNC success better than the ROX and modified ROX indices in ED patients with COVID-19. With its simplicity and efficiency, it may be the appropriate tool to guide management and ED disposition for COVID-19 patients receiving HFNC in the ED.
dc.identifier.citationWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine Vol.24 No.3 (2023) , 511-521
dc.identifier.doi10.5811/westjem.58311
dc.identifier.eissn19369018
dc.identifier.issn1936900X
dc.identifier.pmid37278775
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85162268272
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/87740
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleRatio of Oxygen Saturation to Inspired Oxygen, ROX Index, Modified ROX Index to Predict High Flow Cannula Success in COVID-19 Patients: Multicenter Validation Study
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85162268272&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage521
oaire.citation.issue3
oaire.citation.startPage511
oaire.citation.titleWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine
oaire.citation.volume24
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationRatchaburi Regional Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationBanphaeo General Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationBuddhachinaraj Phitsanulok Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationPrachuap Khiri Khan Hospital

Files

Collections