Optimizing digital implant impressions: Evaluating the significance of scan body image deficiency and alignment under varied scan body exposures
Issued Date
2023-01-01
Resource Type
eISSN
19326203
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85171956242
Pubmed ID
37733766
Journal Title
PloS one
Volume
18
Issue
9
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
PloS one Vol.18 No.9 (2023) , e0291831
Suggested Citation
Petchmedyai P., Thanasrisuebwong P. Optimizing digital implant impressions: Evaluating the significance of scan body image deficiency and alignment under varied scan body exposures. PloS one Vol.18 No.9 (2023) , e0291831. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0291831 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/90267
Title
Optimizing digital implant impressions: Evaluating the significance of scan body image deficiency and alignment under varied scan body exposures
Author(s)
Author's Affiliation
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
In implant dentistry, the advent of intraoral scanning technology has revolutionized traditional clinical processes by streamlining procedures and ensuring predictable treatment outcomes. However, achieving accurate virtual implant positions using intraoral scanners and scan bodies can be influenced by various clinical and laboratory factors. This study aims to investigate the impact of scan body image capture deficiency and scan body alignment methods in computer-aided design (CAD) software on the accuracy of virtual implant positions, particularly in different implant depths. Three stereolithographic half-arch implant models with different implant depths were prepared, representing three scenarios of scan body exposure: full exposed scan body, 2/3 exposed scan body, and 1/3 exposed scan body. The scan body image capture deficiency and alignment methods were simulated using CAD software. The deviation of virtual implant positions obtained from different scenarios were evaluated using 3D analysis software. The highest angular and linear deviation (0.237±0.059 degrees, 0.084±0.068 mm) were found in the 1/4 upper and lower part scan body deficiency using the 1-point alignment method in the 1/3 exposed scan body. Two-way ANOVA analysis revealed significant effects of scan deficiency on virtual implant position deviations across all scan body exposures, except for the linear deviation when the scan body was exposed 2/3 of its length. Furthermore, scan deficiencies in the 1/4 upper and lower parts of the scan body significantly affected implant angular deviation regardless of scan body exposure, while implant linear deviation was specifically affected when the scan body was exposed to only 1/3 of its total length. Deficiencies in scan body acquisition, particularly in deep soft tissue situations, can lead to deviations in both angular and linear positioning of virtual implants. Employing appropriate scan body alignment methods such as a 3-point alignment approach demonstrates better accuracy compared to a 1-point alignment.