Central Nervous System Outcomes of Lazertinib Versus Gefitinib in EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC: A LASER301 Subset Analysis
dc.contributor.author | Soo R.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Cho B.C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kim J.H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ahn M.J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lee K.H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Zimina A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Orlov S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bondarenko I. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lee Y.G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lim Y.N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lee S.S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lee K.H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pang Y.K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Fong C.H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kang J.H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lim C.S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Danchaivijitr P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kilickap S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Yang J.C.H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Arslan C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lee H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Park S.N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Cicin I. | |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-11T18:02:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-12-11T18:02:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-12-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Lazertinib, a third-generation mutant-selective EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, improved progression-free survival compared with gefitinib in the phase 3 LASER301 study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04248829). Here, we report the efficacy of lazertinib and gefitinib in patients with baseline central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Methods: Treatment-naive patients with EGFR–mutated advanced NSCLC were randomized one-to-one to lazertinib (240 mg/d) or gefitinib (250 mg/d). Patients with asymptomatic or stable CNS metastases were included if any planned radiation, surgery, or steroids were completed more than 2 weeks before randomization. For patients with CNS metastases confirmed at screening or subsequently suspected, CNS imaging was performed every 6 weeks for 18 months, then every 12 weeks. End points assessed by blinded independent central review and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 included intracranial progression-free survival, intracranial objective response rate, and intracranial duration of response. Results: Of the 393 patients enrolled in LASER301, 86 (lazertinib, n = 45; gefitinib, n = 41) had measurable and or non-measurable baseline CNS metastases. The median intracranial progression-free survival in the lazertinib group was 28.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.8–28.2) versus 8.4 months (95% CI: 6.7–not reached [NR]) in the gefitinib group (hazard ratio = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20–0.89, p = 0.02). Among patients with measurable CNS lesions, the intracranial objective response rate was numerically higher with lazertinib (94%; n = 17) versus gefitinib (73%; n = 11, p = 0.124). The median intracranial duration of response with lazertinib was NR (8.3–NR) versus 6.3 months (2.8–NR) with gefitinib. Tolerability was similar to the overall LASER301 population. Conclusions: In patients with CNS metastases, lazertinib significantly improved intracranial progression-free survival compared with gefitinib, with more durable responses. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Thoracic Oncology Vol.18 No.12 (2023) , 1756-1766 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.08.017 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 15561380 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 15560864 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 37865896 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85177597078 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/91416 | |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | |
dc.subject | Medicine | |
dc.title | Central Nervous System Outcomes of Lazertinib Versus Gefitinib in EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC: A LASER301 Subset Analysis | |
dc.type | Conference Paper | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85177597078&origin=inward | |
oaire.citation.endPage | 1766 | |
oaire.citation.issue | 12 | |
oaire.citation.startPage | 1756 | |
oaire.citation.title | Journal of Thoracic Oncology | |
oaire.citation.volume | 18 | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Siriraj Hospital | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Yonsei Cancer Hospital | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | İstinye Üniversitesi | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Chungbuk National University Hospital | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Hospital Pulau Pinang | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Hospital Umum Sarawak | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Yuhan Corporation | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | National Taiwan University Hospital | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Dnipro State Medical University | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Inje University, College of Medicine | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Yeungnam University Medical Center | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan university | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Izmir Ekonomi Universitesi | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | SKKU School of Medicine | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | University of Malaya Medical Centre | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | College of Medicine, Pochon CHA University | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Trakya Üniversitesi | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Pavlov University | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | Hospital Sultan Ismail | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | State Budgetary Healthcare Institution of Omsk Region | |
oairecerif.author.affiliation | National University Cancer Institute |