Microbes and marginalisation: ‘Facing’ antimicrobial resistance in bedridden patients in a peri-urban area of Thailand
Issued Date
2024-12-01
Resource Type
eISSN
26673215
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85205536020
Journal Title
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Volume
6
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health Vol.6 (2024)
Suggested Citation
Whanpuch P., Perris A., Poompruek P., Chandler C.I.R., Sri-ngernyuang L. Microbes and marginalisation: ‘Facing’ antimicrobial resistance in bedridden patients in a peri-urban area of Thailand. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health Vol.6 (2024). doi:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100489 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/101578
Title
Microbes and marginalisation: ‘Facing’ antimicrobial resistance in bedridden patients in a peri-urban area of Thailand
Author's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Reducing human-microbial encounters through improved infection prevention and control (IPC) is widely acknowledged to be critical for reducing the emergence, transmission and burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). However, despite its centrality in the Global Action Plan (GAP) on AMR and adoption as a goal in National Action Plans around the world, there has been limited progress on reducing the incidence of antimicrobial resistant infections globally. In this paper, we argue that closer attention to different faces of AMR could propel progress in this area, with a focus on bedridden people situated in liminal spaces in the Thai health system and suburban economy. Our ethnographic fieldwork followed the cases of 16 bedridden people through the eyes of their carers and medical staff. We 'descended into the ordinary' to encounter individuals living - and dying - in the shadows of the labour-intensive suburbs of Bangkok. Here, AMR and IPC protocols are operationalised in the context of competing priorities and pragmatic decision-making. Focussing on three ethnographic vignettes, we use the analytic frames of precarity and care to consider how particular (bedridden) bodies are differentially exposed to AMR infections in the context of economic, social, and political arrangements that structure embodied vulnerabilities and forms and foci of care. Whilst the political work of calculating the burden of AMR may be oriented around galvanising support through a sense of magnitude and generalised risk, this research serves as a reminder that the faces of AMR include those who disproportionately shoulder the global burden of AMR, making it at once exceptional and ordinary.