Enhancement of teaching and learning quality through assessment for learning: a case in chemical engineering
Issued Date
2024-01-01
Resource Type
eISSN
23977604
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85183755908
Journal Title
Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning (2024)
Suggested Citation
Tongtummachat T., Jaree A., Akkarawatkhoosith N. Enhancement of teaching and learning quality through assessment for learning: a case in chemical engineering. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning (2024). doi:10.1108/JRIT-09-2023-0137 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/97102
Title
Enhancement of teaching and learning quality through assessment for learning: a case in chemical engineering
Author(s)
Author's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Purpose: This article presents our experience in implementing the assessment for learning process (AfL) to enhance the teaching–learning quality, which has faced numerous challenges impacting educational quality. The effectiveness of this technique is demonstrated through a case study conducted in a core course of chemical engineering. Design/methodology/approach: The article shares insights into the systematic course design and planning processes that were discussed and developed through AfL practices. Significant emphasis is placed on implementing formative and summative student self-assessment surveys as simple yet effective methods to meet this purpose. Quantitative data were collected and analyzed over three consecutive academic years (2020–2022) using various statistical parameters such as percentage, interquartile range and the program’s numerical goal (%G). Findings: The AfL process via formative and summative surveys could significantly and effectively improve teaching–learning quality. These findings assist educators in identifying appropriate teaching methods and recognizing areas of weakness and strength, thereby facilitating continuous improvement in the teaching–learning quality. Validation methods, including quizzes and numerical grades, were employed to practically verify the outcome obtained from the questionnaires. Practical implications: The AfL techniques demonstrated in this study can be directly implemented or adapted for various educational fields to enhance the teaching–learning quality. Originality/value: The practical implementation of AfL in an engineering context has hardly been reported, particularly in chemical engineering. This work represents the practical implementation of AfL to enhance engineering field education.
