Effectiveness of orthotic treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a scoping review protocol of systematic reviews
Issued Date
2023-11-08
Resource Type
eISSN
20446055
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85176386883
Pubmed ID
37940156
Journal Title
BMJ open
Volume
13
Issue
11
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
BMJ open Vol.13 No.11 (2023) , e078064
Suggested Citation
Siripanyakhemakul W., Permpool K., Seng-Iad S. Effectiveness of orthotic treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a scoping review protocol of systematic reviews. BMJ open Vol.13 No.11 (2023) , e078064. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078064 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/91110
Title
Effectiveness of orthotic treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a scoping review protocol of systematic reviews
Author(s)
Author's Affiliation
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Spinal orthosis is a common conservative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and a large body of compelling evidence from systemic review studies strongly supports the use of spinal orthosis treatment in patients with this condition. To further improve our understanding of the available data, the aim of this study is to develop and propose a protocol for a scoping review of systematic reviews of studies that investigated the effectiveness of orthotic treatment in patients with AIS. Systematic synthesis and understanding of the data will improve the efficacy of spinal orthosis treatment in this patient population. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: Using the scoping review methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley in 2005, we developed and herewith propose a scoping review protocol to evaluate systematic reviews of studies that investigated the effectiveness of orthotic treatment in AIS. Our proposed scoping review proposal is briefly described, as follows. A search of seven online databases will be conducted to identify systematic reviews published in English language from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2023, and grey literature and reference lists of included articles will also be searched. A two-stage screening process consisting of a title and abstract screening and a full-text review will be used to determine articles' eligibility. All eligible articles will be extracted, charted and evaluated using Assessing the MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews Version 2 (AMSTAR-2) critical appraisal tool. The charted data will be quantitatively analysed and summarised, and qualitatively analysed using narrative synthesis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No primary data will be collected; therefore, ethics approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through national and international conferences and publication in a peer-reviewed journal.