Clinical and radiologic outcomes in patients with meniscal root tears
Issued Date
2024-12-01
Resource Type
eISSN
14712474
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85188450067
Journal Title
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Volume
25
Issue
1
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Vol.25 No.1 (2024)
Suggested Citation
Manatrakul R., Loeffler M., Bharadwaj U.U., Joseph G.B., Lansdown D., Feeley B., Baal J.D., Guimaraes J.B., Link T.M. Clinical and radiologic outcomes in patients with meniscal root tears. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Vol.25 No.1 (2024). doi:10.1186/s12891-024-07359-4 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/97781
Title
Clinical and radiologic outcomes in patients with meniscal root tears
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: Meniscal root tears can lead to early knee osteoarthritis and pain. This study aimed (1) to compare clinical and radiological outcomes between patients who underwent arthroscopic meniscal root repair after meniscal root tears and those who received non-surgical treatment, and (2) to identify whether baseline MRI findings could be potential predictors for future treatment strategies. Methods: Patients with meniscal root tears were identified from our picture archiving and communication system from 2016 to 2020. Two radiologists reviewed radiographs and MRI studies using Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading and a modified Whole Organ MRI Scoring (WORMS) at baseline and follow-up. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) of follow-up radiographs and MRI studies were 134 (44–443) days and 502 (260–1176) days, respectively. MR images were assessed for root tear-related findings. Pain scores using visual analogue scale (VAS) and management strategies (non-surgical vs. arthroscopic root repair) were also collected. Chi-squared tests and independent t-tests were used to assess differences regarding clinical and imaging variables between treatment groups. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the associations between baseline MRI findings and each future treatment. Results: Ninety patients were included. VAS pain scores were significantly (p < 0.01) lower after arthroscopic repair compared to conservative treatment (1.27±0.38vs.4±0.52) at the last follow-up visit with median (IQR) of 325 (180–1391) days. Increased meniscal extrusion (mm) was associated with higher odds of receiving non-surgical treatment (OR = 1.65, 95%CI 1.02–2.69, p = 0.04). The odds of having arthroscopic repair increased by 19% for every 1 mm increase in the distance of the tear from the root attachment (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.05–1.36, p < 0.01). The odds of undergoing arthroscopic repair were reduced by 49% for every 1 mm increase in the extent of meniscal extrusion (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29–0.91, p = 0.02) as observed in the baseline MRI. Conclusions: Patients who underwent arthroscopic repair had lower pain scores than patients with conservative treatment in the follow-up. Distance of the torn meniscus to the root attachment and the extent of meniscal extrusion were significant predictors for arthroscopic repair in the next three weeks (time from the baseline MRI to the surgery date).