Extubation in neurocritical care patients: the ENIO international prospective study

dc.contributor.authorCinotti R.
dc.contributor.authorMijangos J.C.
dc.contributor.authorPelosi P.
dc.contributor.authorHaenggi M.
dc.contributor.authorGurjar M.
dc.contributor.authorSchultz M.J.
dc.contributor.authorKaye C.
dc.contributor.authorGodoy D.A.
dc.contributor.authorAlvarez P.
dc.contributor.authorIoakeimidou A.
dc.contributor.authorUeno Y.
dc.contributor.authorBadenes R.
dc.contributor.authorSuei Elbuzidi A.A.
dc.contributor.authorPiagnerelli M.
dc.contributor.authorElhadi M.
dc.contributor.authorReza S.T.
dc.contributor.authorAzab M.A.
dc.contributor.authorMcCredie V.
dc.contributor.authorStevens R.D.
dc.contributor.authorDigitale J.C.
dc.contributor.authorFong N.
dc.contributor.authorAsehnoune K.
dc.contributor.authorAbback P.s.
dc.contributor.authorCodorniu A.
dc.contributor.authorCiterio G.
dc.contributor.authorSala V.L.
dc.contributor.authorAstuto M.
dc.contributor.authorTringali E.
dc.contributor.authorAlampi D.
dc.contributor.authorRocco M.
dc.contributor.authorMaugeri J.G.
dc.contributor.authorBellissima A.
dc.contributor.authorFilippini M.
dc.contributor.authorLazzeri N.
dc.contributor.authorCortegiani A.
dc.contributor.authorIppolito M.
dc.contributor.authorRobba C.
dc.contributor.authorBattaglini D.
dc.contributor.authorBiston P.
dc.contributor.authorAl-Gharyani M.F.
dc.contributor.authorChabanne R.
dc.contributor.authorAstier L.
dc.contributor.authorSoyer B.
dc.contributor.authorGaugain S.
dc.contributor.authorZimmerli A.
dc.contributor.authorPietsch U.
dc.contributor.authorFilipovic M.
dc.contributor.authorBrandi G.
dc.contributor.authorBicciato G.
dc.contributor.authorSerrano A.
dc.contributor.authorMonleon B.
dc.contributor.authorvan Vliet P.
dc.contributor.authorGerretsen B.M.
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz-Macias I.X.
dc.contributor.authorOto J.
dc.contributor.authorEnomoto N.
dc.contributor.authorMatsuda T.
dc.contributor.authorMasui N.
dc.contributor.authorGarçon P.
dc.contributor.authorZarka J.
dc.contributor.authorVermeijden W.J.
dc.contributor.authorCornet A.D.
dc.contributor.authorInurrigarro S.R.
dc.contributor.authorDomínguez R.C.L.
dc.contributor.authorBellini M.M.
dc.contributor.authorHaedo M.M.G.
dc.contributor.authorLamot L.
dc.contributor.authorOrquera J.
dc.contributor.authorBiais M.
dc.contributor.authorGeorges D.
dc.contributor.authorBaronia A.
dc.contributor.authorMiranda-Ackerman R.C.
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa-Camacho F.J.
dc.contributor.authorPorter J.
dc.contributor.authorLopez-Morales M.
dc.contributor.authorGeeraerts T.
dc.contributor.authorCompagnon B.
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Torres D.
dc.contributor.authorProl-Silva E.
dc.contributor.authorYahya H.B.
dc.contributor.authorKhaled A.
dc.contributor.authorGhula M.
dc.contributor.authorAndrea C.N.
dc.contributor.authorDaniela P.M.
dc.contributor.authorDeana C.
dc.contributor.authorVetrugno L.
dc.contributor.authorChavez M.J.R.
dc.contributor.authorTrujillo R.M.
dc.contributor.authorLegros V.
dc.contributor.authorBrochet B.
dc.contributor.authorHuet O.
dc.contributor.authorGeslain M.
dc.contributor.authorvan der Jagt M.
dc.contributor.authorvan Steenkiste J.
dc.contributor.authorAhmed H.
dc.contributor.authorCoombs A.E.
dc.contributor.authorWelbourne J.
dc.contributor.authorPineda A.A.V.
dc.contributor.authorCastillo V.H.N.
dc.contributor.authorAzab M.A.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-20T05:24:10Z
dc.date.available2023-06-20T05:24:10Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Neurocritical care patients receive prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), but there is poor specific information in this high-risk population about the liberation strategies of invasive mechanical ventilation. Methods: ENIO (NCT03400904) is an international, prospective observational study, in 73 intensive care units (ICUs) in 18 countries from 2018 to 2020. Neurocritical care patients with a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) ≤ 12, receiving IMV ≥ 24 h, undergoing extubation attempt or tracheostomy were included. The primary endpoint was extubation failure by day 5. An extubation success prediction score was created, with 2/3 of patients randomly allocated to the training cohort and 1/3 to the validation cohort. Secondary endpoints were the duration of IMV and in-ICU mortality. Results: 1512 patients were included. Among the 1193 (78.9%) patients who underwent an extubation attempt, 231 (19.4%) failures were recorded. The score for successful extubation prediction retained 20 variables as independent predictors. The area under the curve (AUC) in the training cohort was 0.79 95% confidence interval (CI95) [0.71–0.87] and 0.71 CI95 [0.61–0.81] in the validation cohort. Patients with extubation failure displayed a longer IMV duration (14 [7–21] vs 6 [3–11] days) and a higher in-ICU mortality rate (8.7% vs 2.4%). Three hundred and nineteen (21.1%) patients underwent tracheostomy without extubation attempt. Patients with direct tracheostomy displayed a longer duration of IMV and higher in-ICU mortality than patients with an extubation attempt (success and failure). Conclusions: In neurocritical care patients, extubation failure is high and is associated with unfavourable outcomes. A score could predict extubation success in multiple settings. However, it will be mandatory to validate our findings in another prospective independent cohort.
dc.identifier.citationIntensive Care Medicine Vol.48 No.11 (2022) , 1539-1550
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00134-022-06825-8
dc.identifier.eissn14321238
dc.identifier.issn03424642
dc.identifier.pmid36038713
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85136883213
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/87219
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleExtubation in neurocritical care patients: the ENIO international prospective study
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85136883213&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage1550
oaire.citation.issue11
oaire.citation.startPage1539
oaire.citation.titleIntensive Care Medicine
oaire.citation.volume48
oairecerif.author.affiliationIRCCS San Martino Polyclinic Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationSanatorio Pasteur, Argentina
oairecerif.author.affiliationTokushima University Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationHamad Medical Corporation
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Al-Fateh Faculty of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationHospital Maciel Montevideo
oairecerif.author.affiliationHospital Civil de Guadalajara
oairecerif.author.affiliationNantes Université
oairecerif.author.affiliationCHU de Nantes
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversità degli Studi di Genova
oairecerif.author.affiliationSanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences Lucknow
oairecerif.author.affiliationAberdeen Royal Infirmary
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of California, San Francisco
oairecerif.author.affiliationDhaka Medical College and Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationHospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity Hospital Bern
oairecerif.author.affiliationCairo University
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversidad de Guadalajara
oairecerif.author.affiliationNuffield Department of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationToronto Western Hospital University of Toronto
oairecerif.author.affiliationAmsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam
oairecerif.author.affiliationJohns Hopkins School of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversité Libre de Bruxelles

Files

Collections