Effectiveness of Smartphone Applications vs Conventional Care in Warfarin Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Time in the Therapeutic Range

dc.contributor.authorWongkornrat W.
dc.contributor.authorSiriussawakul A.
dc.contributor.authorSuraarunsumrit P.
dc.contributor.authorCharoenrat T.
dc.contributor.authorSatidwongpibool T.
dc.contributor.correspondenceWongkornrat W.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-11T18:14:31Z
dc.date.available2024-08-11T18:14:31Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: Warfarin is extensively used as an oral anticoagulant; however, its clinical application is complicated by a narrow therapeutic index. This investigation evaluated the efficacy of a drug reminder application versus traditional care in facilitating patients’ maintenance of the therapeutic range, as well as in stabilizing the time in the therapeutic range (TTR). Materials and Methods: This was a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Eligible participants were patients receiving warfarin therapy for at least 3 months and demonstrating at least two consecutive international normalized ratio (INR) values within the therapeutic range of 2 to 3 during the preceding 6 months. Patients in the intervention group were provided with a smartphone-based drug reminder application. All participant INRs were collected for 6 months. The outcome measures were TTR, INR, TTR of drug‒drug interactions, and warfarin-related complications. Results: Forty patients were recruited between January 2021 and August 2023. The mean TTR was 66.11%±9.8% for the intervention group and 67.31%±18.08% for the control group. With analysis of covariance, the results were slightly better in the intervention group, but the differences were not statistically significant (95%CI = -5.67 – 1.92, P-value = 0.323). For the 6-month INR monitoring, 6 out of 8 patients who could maintain the therapeutic INR range were in the intervention group. There were no statistically significant differences in warfarin-related complications between the two groups (20% vs 15%, RR 1.333, 95%CI = 0.3413 – 5.2086, P-value = 0.6790). Conclusion: The drug reminder application likely improved the TTR, although without statistical significance. Further studies are needed to identify technology assistance in improving treatment outcomes.
dc.identifier.citationSiriraj Medical Journal Vol.76 No.7 (2024) , 444-453
dc.identifier.doi10.33192/SMJ.V76I7.268122
dc.identifier.eissn22288082
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85200320945
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/100432
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleEffectiveness of Smartphone Applications vs Conventional Care in Warfarin Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Time in the Therapeutic Range
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85200320945&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage453
oaire.citation.issue7
oaire.citation.startPage444
oaire.citation.titleSiriraj Medical Journal
oaire.citation.volume76
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationNakhon Phanom Hospital

Files

Collections