Implementation of high-performance CPR by basic life support (BLS) personnel: a pilot study in Thailand
Issued Date
2026-01-01
Resource Type
eISSN
26665204
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105023476653
Journal Title
Resuscitation Plus
Volume
27
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Resuscitation Plus Vol.27 (2026)
Suggested Citation
Riyapan S., Chokvanich W., Chakorn T., Somboonkul B., Chantanakomes J., Phinyo N., Konwitthayasin P., Buangam K., Saengsung P. Implementation of high-performance CPR by basic life support (BLS) personnel: a pilot study in Thailand. Resuscitation Plus Vol.27 (2026). doi:10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101164 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/114440
Title
Implementation of high-performance CPR by basic life support (BLS) personnel: a pilot study in Thailand
Author's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background High-performance cardiopulmonary resuscitation (HP-CPR) is a structured, pit-crew-style resuscitation model that has been shown to improve performance in advanced life support (ALS) systems. However, its applicability in volunteer-based basic life support (BLS) settings remains uncertain. This study aimed to describe the implementation of HP-CPR training for BLS personnel in Bangkok, Thailand, and to evaluate its impact on BLS performance using video-based process indicators, as well as to report patient- and system-level characteristics before and after the intervention. Methods We conducted a single-centre, before-and-after study of adults with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) managed by the Siriraj EMS Centre between July 2022 and January 2025. HP-CPR training for BLS personnel was delivered over a fivemonth period. The primary outcome was BLS performance, assessed through predefined process indicators using video review. Secondary outcomes included system-level characteristics and clinical outcomes. Results Of 423 patients screened, 214 met the inclusion criteria (110 pre-intervention; 104 post-intervention). Video recordings were available for 39 cases. Post-training, significant improvements were observed in two performance indicators: “counting during CPR” (0.0 % vs. 66.7 %, p < 0.01) and the “hover technique” (0.0 % vs. 62.5 %, p < 0.01). Other indicators, including uninterrupted CPR, assisted ventilation, AED use, and data handover, improved but did not reach statistical significance. Secondary outcomes—including AED use, CPR initiation by BLS, prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and survival outcomes—showed no significant differences between phases. Conclusion Following HP-CPR training, improvements were observed in selected BLS process indicators. However, further research is needed with larger sample sizes to assess the long-term impact of HP-CPR training in volunteer-based EMS systems.