To drain or not to drain following posttraumatic ear reconstruction with Dieffenbach's postauricular flap in patients with antithrombotic therapy

Abstract

Purpose: To measure the association between drainage use and postoperative complications (POCs) after posttraumatic ear reconstruction (PTER) with Dieffenbach's postauricular flap (DPF) in patients with antithrombotic therapy (ATT). Methods: This was a retrospective double-cohort study of patients undergoing posttraumatic DRF with vs. without drainage in 4 maxillofacial units during a 7-year interval. The primary predictor variable was drainage use, and the main outcome was POCs (i.e., auricular haematoma and infection). Descriptive, bi- and multivariate statistics were computed with P ≤ 0.05 defined as statistically significant. Results: The sample was composed of 365 unilateral PTER patients (14% POCs, 15.6% ATT, 34.5% females) aged 58.1 ± 19.7 years (range, 18–101). Among subjects with ATT, drainage use significantly reduced POCs (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.8; P = 0.009; absolute risk reduction [ASR], 34.04%; NNT, 3), especially when delayed surgery > 5 h after trauma was evident (forward stepwise logistic modelling: OR, 20.6; 95% CI, 2 to 215.9; P = 0.012). Drainage placement under DPF in ATT patients with smoking habit, concomitant diseases (e.g. diabetes mellitus), ear cartilage loss, or wound contamination almost halved POC rates (ASR, 34.5 ± 12.1%; range, 22.1% to 49%). Patient's age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, alcohol misuse, ATT and antibiotic type, and international normalised ratio (INR) before surgery had no meaningful effect on POCs. Conclusions: Drainage should be placed under DPF in patients with ATT, regardless of age, gender, ATT and antibiotic type, and preoperative INR.