A narrative review on the future of ARDS: evolving definitions, pathophysiology, and tailored management

dc.contributor.authorAl-Husinat L.
dc.contributor.authorAzzam S.
dc.contributor.authorAl Sharie S.
dc.contributor.authorAraydah M.
dc.contributor.authorBattaglini D.
dc.contributor.authorAbushehab S.
dc.contributor.authorCortes-Puentes G.A.
dc.contributor.authorSchultz M.J.
dc.contributor.authorRocco P.R.M.
dc.contributor.correspondenceAl-Husinat L.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-04T18:06:22Z
dc.date.available2025-03-04T18:06:22Z
dc.date.issued2025-12-01
dc.description.abstractAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a severe complication of critical illness, characterized by bilateral lung infiltrates and hypoxemia. Its clinical and pathophysiological heterogeneity poses challenges for both diagnosis and treatment. This review outlines the evolution of ARDS definitions, discusses the underlying pathophysiology of ARDS, and examines the clinical implications of its heterogeneity. Traditional ARDS definitions required invasive mechanical ventilation and relied on arterial blood gas measurements to calculate the PaO2/FiO2 ratio. Recent updates have expanded these criteria to include patients receiving noninvasive respiratory support, such as high-flow nasal oxygen, and the adoption of the SpO2/FiO2 ratio as an alternative to the PaO2/FiO2 ratio. While these changes broaden the diagnostic criteria, they also introduce additional complexity. ARDS heterogeneity—driven by varying etiologies, clinical subphenotypes, and underlying biological mechanisms—highlights the limitations of a uniform management approach. Emerging evidence highlights the presence of distinct ARDS subphenotypes, each defined by unique molecular and clinical characteristics, offering a pathway to more precise therapeutic targeting. Advances in omics technologies—encompassing genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics—are paving the way for precision-medicine approaches with the potential to revolutionize ARDS management by tailoring interventions to individual patient profiles. This paradigm shift from broad diagnostic categories to precise, subphenotype-driven care holds promise for redefining the landscape of treatment for ARDS and, ultimately, improving outcomes in this complex, multifaceted syndrome.
dc.identifier.citationCritical Care Vol.29 No.1 (2025)
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13054-025-05291-0
dc.identifier.eissn1466609X
dc.identifier.issn13648535
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85218447776
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/105490
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleA narrative review on the future of ARDS: evolving definitions, pathophysiology, and tailored management
dc.typeReview
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85218447776&origin=inward
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.titleCritical Care
oaire.citation.volume29
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
oairecerif.author.affiliationIRCCS San Martino Polyclinic Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationIstishari Hospital, Amman
oairecerif.author.affiliationKing Hussein Cancer Center
oairecerif.author.affiliationYarmouk University
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversità degli Studi di Genova
oairecerif.author.affiliationMedizinische Universität Wien
oairecerif.author.affiliationNuffield Department of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationMayo Clinic
oairecerif.author.affiliationAmsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Files

Collections