Single time-point kidney dosimetry in177Lu-PSMA therapy: A comparison between AI-based and manual segmentation approaches

dc.contributor.authorChaiwongsa T.
dc.contributor.authorCharoenphun P.
dc.contributor.authorChamroonrat W.
dc.contributor.authorChuamsaamarkkee K.
dc.contributor.correspondenceChaiwongsa T.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-06T18:30:20Z
dc.date.available2026-02-06T18:30:20Z
dc.date.issued2026-01-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: Single time-point (STP) dosimetry has become a practical and efficient approach for personalised radioligand therapy (RLT), with 48-hours post-injection identified as optimal for kidney dose estimation in ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA therapy for prostate cancer. However, segmentation accuracy remains a critical factor affecting dosimetry reliability. AI-based segmentation has recently been integrated into commercial software to improve efficiency and reduce variability. Objectives: This study aims to quantify kidney absorbed doses in patients receiving ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA therapy using STP dosimetry and to compare the accuracy and consistency of AI-based segmentation versus manual segmentation techniques. Materials and methods: Eight treatment cycles from 5 patients of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA were retrospectively analysed. In this work, whole-body SPECT/CT imaging was performed approximately 48 hours post-injection. Then, kidney dosimetry was calculated using voxel-based STP (Hänscheid method) within MIM SurePlan™ MRT software. Kidney volumes of interest (VOIs) were segmented using three approaches: 1) AI-based automatic segmentation, 2) AI-based with manual refinement, and 3) fully manual segmentation. Mean absorbed doses and VOI volumes were compared across methods. Statistical analyses included ANOVA, Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), and Jaccard Similarity Coefficient (JSC). Results: No significant differences in mean kidney absorbed doses were found across segmentation methods (p=0.964), while kidney VOI volumes showed significant variation (p<0.05). AI-based segmentation achieved high concordance with manual delineation (DSC: 0.898±0.019; JSC: 0.816±0.031). Conclusion: AI-based segmentation provides comparable absorbed dose results to manual segmentation, with reduced time and inter-observer variability.
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Associated Medical Sciences Vol.59 No.1 (2026) , 9-17
dc.identifier.doi10.12982/JAMS.2026.002
dc.identifier.eissn25396056
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105016529425
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/114730
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectHealth Professions
dc.titleSingle time-point kidney dosimetry in177Lu-PSMA therapy: A comparison between AI-based and manual segmentation approaches
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105016529425&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage17
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.startPage9
oaire.citation.titleJournal of Associated Medical Sciences
oaire.citation.volume59
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University

Files

Collections