Efficacy of Treatment for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Issued Date
2023-12-01
Resource Type
eISSN
20726694
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85180226334
Journal Title
Cancers
Volume
15
Issue
24
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Cancers Vol.15 No.24 (2023)
Suggested Citation
Sirisreetreerux P., Poprom N., Numthavaj P., Rattanasiri S., Thakkinstian A. Efficacy of Treatment for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Cancers Vol.15 No.24 (2023). doi:10.3390/cancers15245714 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/95845
Title
Efficacy of Treatment for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Author's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Purpose: This umbrella review focused on evaluating the efficacy and adverse events of the metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients receiving any treatment regimens, including ADT alone or combination treatments. Methods: This study conducted an umbrella review following the PRISMA 2020 checklist, aiming to summarize the available studies to evaluate the efficacy of medical treatments for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. A literature search was performed to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) that included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to September 2023. This study summarized their findings, evaluated overlapping data (i.e., the same RCTs were included in >one SRMA), tested for excessive significance (i.e., observed number of statistically significant studies > expected number by chance) and assessed the quality of the studies. Results: A total of 4191 studies were identified, but only 27 were included. Among those 27 studies, 12 were network meta-analyses and 15 were direct meta-analyses. Most studies showed no statistically significant difference in overall mortality among GnRH agonists, antagonists and bilateral orchiectomy. Combination treatment is more beneficial than ADT alone in both OS and PFS outcomes with more adverse events. Nevertheless, there is no OS advantage of any combination regimen over the others. Conclusion: Combination treatments demonstrated clear benefits in OS and PFS over ADT alone with more AEs. Further studies are needed to compare among combination treatments.