Contrasting Morphological and Anatomical Traits Among Leaves, Stems, and Roots Between Hemiepiphytic (H) Versus Nonhemiepiphytic (NH) Ficus Species

dc.contributor.authorKohkaew R.
dc.contributor.authorNing Q.
dc.contributor.authorLiu X.
dc.contributor.authorPothasin P.
dc.contributor.authorCompton S.G.
dc.contributor.authorLiu H.
dc.contributor.authorYu H.
dc.contributor.correspondenceKohkaew R.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-14T18:10:38Z
dc.date.available2025-08-14T18:10:38Z
dc.date.issued2025-07-01
dc.description.abstractRising temperatures and fluctuating water availability are influencing plant adaptation and survival. As a special growth form, hemiepiphytic plants may have unique adaptations to their stressful habitats. Ficus species are vital in tropical and subtropical forests with well-known contrasting hemiepiphytic (H) and nonhemiepiphytic (NH) growth forms. Although H and NH Ficus species were found differing in resource acquisition and drought tolerance, this hypothesis has never been tested on root traits. Here we measured 29 morphological and anatomical traits of leaves, stems, and roots of five H and five NH Ficus species. We found that H species exhibited smaller but thicker leaves, higher leaf mass per area, and leaf dry matter content, which enhances water retention. They also had higher wood density and root density, prioritizing tolerance under drought-prone environments. On the other hand, NH species displayed larger leaf areas, higher stomatal density, greater specific root length, and specific surface area, optimizing for growth in resource-rich environments. While NH species capitalize on high-connectivity networks to maximize resource acquisition, H species leverage low-connectivity networks with greater root trait connectivity, indicating flexible responses to stressful habitats. This study highlights the contrasting potential of drought tolerance of H and NH Ficus species through morphological and anatomical traits, showing a consistent adaptive pattern between above- and belowground organs.
dc.identifier.citationPhysiologia Plantarum Vol.177 No.4 (2025)
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ppl.70440
dc.identifier.eissn13993054
dc.identifier.issn00319317
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105012603682
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/111595
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciences
dc.titleContrasting Morphological and Anatomical Traits Among Leaves, Stems, and Roots Between Hemiepiphytic (H) Versus Nonhemiepiphytic (NH) Ficus Species
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105012603682&origin=inward
oaire.citation.issue4
oaire.citation.titlePhysiologia Plantarum
oaire.citation.volume177
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Leeds
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationSouth China Botanical Garden

Files

Collections